hppants
Well-known member
I read an article in this month's Rider magazine with interest regarding a recently released AMA report on the safety of lane splitting. Here's a publically available article on the report. It doesn't offer all of the statistics that the Rider mag article does, but it grabs the gist of it:
https://www.twowheelmania.com/2014/11/02 ... -benefits/......
And here's AMA's release:
https://www.americanmotorcyclist.com/New ... tting.aspx.....
To be clear, I'm not touting the AMA. I do think that the sampling in the report is significant and the numbers don't lie regardless of who's using them.
Also, the report makes it clear that to be effective for both the biker and the cager, the safe guidance for lane splitting MUST be followed. There is a right way and a wrong way. The wrong way can kill you - period. But it would appear that, at least from the data in this report, if done correctly, lane splitting is not only safe, but may actually be safer for the motorcyclists than ... well .... NOT lane splitting.
I have to admit - before I went to Europe, I thought this whole concept was ridiculous and unfathomable. But after seeing it in widespread use particularly in Barcelona (many multi-lane, high traffic situation), it's very easy to see the safety benefit of this to the motorcyclists:
1. We get our own lane all to ourselves. Very little chance of another motorcycle rear-ending us. Our view in our "lane" ahead is virtually unobstructed.
2. With cars stacked in each lane adjacent to us, there is little chance that they will switch lanes and mow us because the vehicle next to them is blocking that from happening. When traffic starts to spread out, the report indicates the risk goes up significantly. This is why following the CHP guidelines is paramount. Filter back into a normal lane when traffic spreads out. Don't go faster than 10 mph above the cages when splitting. Scan way ahead as you ride and split, etc.
3. With vehicles acting as a visible wall on either side of you, the risk of a vehicle pulling out in front of you from a perpendicular road, street, driveway, etc. is greatly reduced.
The 3 situations above are my biggest fears as a rider in high traffic situations. Originally, I thought lane splitting was a small way to deal with urban traffic issues. Perhaps encourage motorists to get a motorcycle for traffic purposes and ultimately get a few more vehicles moving at the same time on a congested highway. Now, I'm not so sure that is the primary benefit. BION - I think the safety benefit for the biker is the big picture item.
I'm hoping this catches on elsewhere in the States.
https://www.twowheelmania.com/2014/11/02 ... -benefits/......
And here's AMA's release:
https://www.americanmotorcyclist.com/New ... tting.aspx.....
To be clear, I'm not touting the AMA. I do think that the sampling in the report is significant and the numbers don't lie regardless of who's using them.
Also, the report makes it clear that to be effective for both the biker and the cager, the safe guidance for lane splitting MUST be followed. There is a right way and a wrong way. The wrong way can kill you - period. But it would appear that, at least from the data in this report, if done correctly, lane splitting is not only safe, but may actually be safer for the motorcyclists than ... well .... NOT lane splitting.
I have to admit - before I went to Europe, I thought this whole concept was ridiculous and unfathomable. But after seeing it in widespread use particularly in Barcelona (many multi-lane, high traffic situation), it's very easy to see the safety benefit of this to the motorcyclists:
1. We get our own lane all to ourselves. Very little chance of another motorcycle rear-ending us. Our view in our "lane" ahead is virtually unobstructed.
2. With cars stacked in each lane adjacent to us, there is little chance that they will switch lanes and mow us because the vehicle next to them is blocking that from happening. When traffic starts to spread out, the report indicates the risk goes up significantly. This is why following the CHP guidelines is paramount. Filter back into a normal lane when traffic spreads out. Don't go faster than 10 mph above the cages when splitting. Scan way ahead as you ride and split, etc.
3. With vehicles acting as a visible wall on either side of you, the risk of a vehicle pulling out in front of you from a perpendicular road, street, driveway, etc. is greatly reduced.
The 3 situations above are my biggest fears as a rider in high traffic situations. Originally, I thought lane splitting was a small way to deal with urban traffic issues. Perhaps encourage motorists to get a motorcycle for traffic purposes and ultimately get a few more vehicles moving at the same time on a congested highway. Now, I'm not so sure that is the primary benefit. BION - I think the safety benefit for the biker is the big picture item.
I'm hoping this catches on elsewhere in the States.