UselessPickles
Making Grand Canyon replicas from air boxes...
I finally have my Motty AFR Tuner successfully installed and calibrated. Some of the final calibrations required some experimentation with me being the guinea pig since I was the first to install a Motty on a Gen II FJR.
I've done about 80 miles of commuting so far, and the Motty seems to have already tuned the commonly used areas of the map pretty well (cruising and gentle acceleration). Off -> on throttle response in 1st and 2nd gear is already very smooth; no more jerking/twitching (e.g., engine braking with 0% throttle, then rolling on the throttle around a sharp corner).
Less commonly used areas of the map will take longer to get tuned. High throttle + high RPM areas of the map can only be reliably tuned in higher gears because RPMs change so quickly and the throttle is so sensitive in lower gears. I have the Motty configured so that 3rd gear is the lowest gear that it will self-tune up to 100% throttle, and it seems to handle that well. Now I need to find some opportunities to do several 3rd gear full throttle pulls from 2000 RPM up to redline (~115mph) so I can get the 100% throttle area of the map tuned well.
Here's some evidence of the Motty doing its thing...
Here's part of the data log from my ride:
The bottom line is the actual AFR. My target is 13. The other 3 lines are throttle position, RPMs and speed. This is me taking off from a light and casually accelerating up to about 45mph. One point of interest is the RPMs initially increasing, but then decreasing as I slip the clutch to get going.
Here's a portion of the resulting fuel injection map after my ride:
Very similar to a PCIII map, the value in each cell is some amount of fuel that is added/subtracted to/from the amount of fuel requested by the stock fuel injection system. The current RPMs and throttle position are used to find which value in the map is to be used (throttle positions listed across the top, RPMs down the left side).
For comparison, here's the equivalent portion of DynoJet's PCIII map for a stock FJR:
The Motty map is shaping up similar to the PCIII map. Some things to consider when comparing the Motty map to the PCIII map:
I can't wait for this cold weather to go away so I can ride more. The more I ride, the more perfectly my bike will be tuned
I've done about 80 miles of commuting so far, and the Motty seems to have already tuned the commonly used areas of the map pretty well (cruising and gentle acceleration). Off -> on throttle response in 1st and 2nd gear is already very smooth; no more jerking/twitching (e.g., engine braking with 0% throttle, then rolling on the throttle around a sharp corner).
Less commonly used areas of the map will take longer to get tuned. High throttle + high RPM areas of the map can only be reliably tuned in higher gears because RPMs change so quickly and the throttle is so sensitive in lower gears. I have the Motty configured so that 3rd gear is the lowest gear that it will self-tune up to 100% throttle, and it seems to handle that well. Now I need to find some opportunities to do several 3rd gear full throttle pulls from 2000 RPM up to redline (~115mph) so I can get the 100% throttle area of the map tuned well.
Here's some evidence of the Motty doing its thing...
Here's part of the data log from my ride:
The bottom line is the actual AFR. My target is 13. The other 3 lines are throttle position, RPMs and speed. This is me taking off from a light and casually accelerating up to about 45mph. One point of interest is the RPMs initially increasing, but then decreasing as I slip the clutch to get going.
Here's a portion of the resulting fuel injection map after my ride:
Very similar to a PCIII map, the value in each cell is some amount of fuel that is added/subtracted to/from the amount of fuel requested by the stock fuel injection system. The current RPMs and throttle position are used to find which value in the map is to be used (throttle positions listed across the top, RPMs down the left side).
For comparison, here's the equivalent portion of DynoJet's PCIII map for a stock FJR:
The Motty map is shaping up similar to the PCIII map. Some things to consider when comparing the Motty map to the PCIII map:
- The Motty is set up for an RPM resolution of 150 versus the PCIII's resolution of 250.
- The Motty has several more distinct throttle positions in its map, especially in lower throttle positions for better control.
- The values are likely not directly comparable between the two. It looks like the Motty's numbers are generally bigger than the PCII's numbers. This probably just means that the Motty has a finer level of precision for its fuel adjustments (e.g., +5 in the PCIII map might be the same amount of additional fuel as +10 in the Motty map)
I can't wait for this cold weather to go away so I can ride more. The more I ride, the more perfectly my bike will be tuned
Last edited by a moderator: