ANOTHER careless cager gets away with it

Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum

Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

MartyA

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
604
Reaction score
22
Location
Friggin' Icebox of PA
Sorry, this just totally got me going....

Stupid Jury tricks....

:angry2:

Short version - Year ago a Michigan guy in Erie PA turns left into a motorcyclist and kills him, dead at the scene. His BAC is .21. The jury convicts him today of DUI... Not manslaughter, not homicide by motor vehicle, none of that; just DUI.

 
You expect a jury to come to some kind of consensus? The defense attorney knew better and knew it was a slam-dunk.

Even if convicted of manslaughter the driver would likely have served 18 months (with time off for good behavior, etc., etc.).

Some of you believe in kharma, some believe in eternal justice where the truth is known.

The average jury has no idea what they are deciding..."the poor innocent guy had a few drinks, so what, we all do that. He just made a slight mistake like we all could. It really wasn't his fault that motorcycle was there."

Shyeah...roight!

 
That's just ridiculous! That's sounds like the ***** county prosecutor he have. Unbelievable. :madsmiley:

Colbry to ‘own up to consequences'

By NATHAN BRUTTELL Argus-Press Staff Writer

CORUNNA - Shiawassee County Prosecutor Randy Colbry intends to “face the music,” according to his attorney.

Flint defense attorney Jose Brown said Colbry, 59, plans to plead guilty to a charge of operating under the influence (OUIL) and offer a no-contest plea to the charge of fleeing and eluding and causing property damage in connection with a July 7 crash in Venice Township.

“He's not going to ask for any plea bargains,” Brown, a Laingsburg resident, said. “He's going to own up to the consequences of what he did. Mr. Colbry is not asking for any special treatment.”

Brown also explained that the no-contest plea will, in effect, act as a guilty plea.

“This isn't because anyone is trying to play any legal games,” Brown said. “But because of his intoxication, he does not remember fleeing or eluding the scene of the accident.”

Perry resident William Gibson previously stated he witnessed the crash and saw Colbry, in a Dodge Durango, pass through a stop sign, hit a convertible and continue on Vernon Road. Gibson said he followed the Durango on Shipman and Lytle Roads, where the Durango was pulled over by a Shiawassee County Sheriff's vehicle.

The case has since been turned over to the Michigan Attorney General's Office. Spokesperson Matt Frendewey previously confirmed the office received the investigation and could not comment further.

Brown said that an originally scheduled Monday arraignment in Clinton County will not occur because Colbry must complete an in-patient treatment program. He also confirmed that Clinton County Judge Richard Wells would be hearing the case.

“(Colbry) has gone into residential treatment for an alcohol abuse problem,” Brown said. “When he gets through with that, an arraignment plea date will be set up. I want to make it clear that the first available time he has to plead guilty, he's going to do that.”

The treatment program may take “a couple of weeks at least,” according to Brown, but he added that he would be able to make a better guess in the next few days.

Brown also responded to comments and rumors to how Colbry's case has been handled.

“He's not being treated differently than anybody else,” Brown said. “He is going to do the right thing. I've heard questions of ‘Why wasn't he taken to the jail after he was pulled over?' The reason is because he needed medical treatment. Mr. Colbry was injured at the scene. Nothing was pushed under the carpet because he's the prosecutor.”

Yeah, right. We now how everyone gets to postpone arraignments as long as they seek treatment right away. :sarcasm: This county is so corrupt, it's not even funny.

:madsmiley: :madsmiley:

 
One time I arrested an older man for DWI. What made this one special was that he had the right of way but got hit by a kid who ran the stop sign. Unfortunately, the guy who was not at fault was really drunk and got charged with Aggravated DWI. Agg. DWI comes into play for people above .16, who refuse a breath/blood test, or who cause great bodily injury while intoxicated.

So we go to trial and I testify that although drunk, the man was very polite and cooperated fully. The jury got the instructions, which explained exactly what constituted DWI and then went to deliberate. They found the man guilty of the lesser charge of simple DWI. They explained that I had testified the man was polite, so he could not have been aggravated; therefore, they could not find him guilty of aggravated DWI.

You never know what a jury will do or whose side they will decide to take for what reason. It really is a toss-up. That's why so many prosecuters will take a seemingly bull-**** plea instead of going to trial. At least the plea is guaranteed.

 
So he gets a slap on the hand, and told not to do it again? What if it was a minority teen mother, wheeling her poor handicapped baby in a stroller that got killed, instead of one of those fools on a murdersickle?

 
Top