Article regarding crashes and older riders

Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum

Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Murph

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2007
Messages
723
Reaction score
1
Location
Gig Harbor, WA
There have been a rash of fatal motorcycle crashes in the Chicago area this year. The latest happened very close to my home and, when my morbid curiosity prompted me to look up the story, I not only received a description of the incident but also read about the current state of motorcycle rider trends in which older riders are accounting for an increasing number of accidents.

Comments?

Clicky (Admin Note: Annoying Site Registration Required)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's been a trend for a while now... middle-aged people buying first time bikes, usually a large bore bike. In many cases they feel they don't need the safety courses since they're older... and that's a mistake. I'm guessing a large percentage of the wrecks involve alcohol... a bigger mistake. If I hadn't started riding when I was 15, and had never been bitten by the bike bug, I don't think I'd start now. People simply don't pay attention when they drive nowadays.

 
Interesting article. Maybe it's just me, but many parts irk me.

1) Between 2000 and 2006, how many age 45+ deaths happened? Is this a steady upward trend or did the reporter pick those 2 years because they suited his slant? Why didn't he compare 1985 to 2006 when the trend started?

2) While we need more training (how much is enough?), why is there no mention of cage driver safety training? They account for 90 percent of the accidents on the road. Yeah, yeah, I'm more exposed than they are, but... And has there been a corresponding upward trend in cage wrecks in those same years? What percentage of wrecks were motorcycles in 1985 compared to 2006?

3) Who is embarrassed that we need occasional safety training? I'm not. It sharpens the reflexes and skills. That comment strikes me as irresponsible by both the reporter and the ABATE president.

In short, the reporter saw a wreck, turned it into a trendy story, and failed to put together any substantive supporting material. It fits my view of media, all fluff, no depth.

 
Here's the article:

Bikers gaining in years, crashes

Age, inexperience may be behind jump in fatalities

(By Jeff Long and Liam Ford | Tribune staff reporters ----July 17, 2007)

Like a growing number of people in their mid-40s and early 50s, Edward Aiello was a sucker for motorcycles. As soon as warm weather arrived, he was out on his bike, often with his wife, Brenda, sitting behind him, neighbors said Monday.

But the Wood Dale couple's love affair with the open road ended abruptly Sunday morning when they were fatally injured after a pickup truck slammed into their motorcycle in Barrington Hills. "He was crazy about those motorcycles," said next-door neighbor Julius Romo, who recalled how Aiello, 51, was constantly tinkering with his bikes. "They were his pride and joy."

The fatal collision involving the Aiellos, of the 400 block of Jeanne Court in the northwest suburb, is one of the latest in a string of at least 10 fatal motorcycle crashes in the Chicago area in the last month. The last five days have been especially lethal, with at least five deaths.

One motorcyclist was killed Friday when he slammed into a concrete divider at high speed and hit a tree on North Lake Shore Drive. Also Friday, a Chicago police officer was hit by a sport-utility vehicle driven by a man accused of reckless homicide, who authorities say was drunk and high on drugs. Yet another victim, a former Marine, died Saturday after a car struck his motorcycle in South Elgin.

The deaths are part of an increase in the number and rate of fatal crashes involving motorcycles -- especially those ridden by people over age 45 -- in Illinois and throughout the country.

In Illinois, where recent trends mirror national numbers, deaths among motorcyclists older than 45 have risen from 30 in 2000 to 52 in 2006, a 73 percent increase, according to the Illinois Department of Transportation. At the same time, the number of motorcycles registered in the state has risen from 207,689 in 2000 to 287,892 in 2006.

It's unknown at this point exactly what is driving the upward trend in fatal crashes, traffic experts say. But it appears likely the increasing number of older riders taking to the road for the first time has something to do with it.

"Essentially, what you're seeing is the increases of fatalities mostly come among older riders, on larger-body cycles, on rural roads," said Rae Tyson, a spokesman for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

And plenty of motorcycles are being sold to older buyers, said Dean Thompson, a spokesman for the Motorcycle Safety Foundation, a national group based in Irvine, Calif.

"A lot of people who grew up in the motorcycle boom of the '70s are getting older and getting back into riding motorcycles," he said.

Sales of motorcycles in the U.S. have tripled in the last 10 years, with more than 1.1 million sold last year. At the same time, those age 50 and older grew from 8 percent of all motorcycle owners in 1985 to more than 25 percent of the market in 2003, according to the Motorcycle Industry Council, a national trade group also based in Irvine.

Meanwhile, a 2003 study showed that just 38 percent of motorcycle owners had taken a basic safety course, Thompson said.

Members of Chicago ABATE -- A Brotherhood Aimed Towards Education -- a local motorcyclists' rights group, are encouraged to take refresher courses in riding, said Patrick Jones, the group's president.

"It's sort of embarrassing, but you gotta do it," he said.

Longtime road warriors say that at the very time more inexperienced riders are heading onto the highway, larger vehicles such as SUVs make for additional hazards. So despite whatever precautions they take, some motorcyclists run into trouble. That's reflected in their higher death rates, authorities say. Only about 4 percent of registered vehicle owners in Illinois have motorcycles, but they account for 10 percent of all motor vehicle fatalities, according to the Transportation Department.

"In an automobile, you step into your protection," Thompson said. "On a motorcycle, you need to wear it."

Despite the risks, bikers and family members say those killed in recent crashes would never give up their motorcycles.

Frank Ferraro, 40, a former Marine from South Elgin, owned at least two motorcycles over the last several years, said his brother, Tony.

Ferraro was fatally injured on his bike Friday night in South Elgin when he was driving north on Randall Road and collided with a car trying to turn onto Silver Glen Road from Randall, authorities said.

A 1991 graduate of Northern Illinois University, Ferraro "was a very experienced rider and a very safe rider," said his sister, Denise Ferraro.

In contrast, many of those buying motorcycles in recent years have plenty of enthusiasm, but not experience.

An advance in their fortunes often leads older riders to their first motorcycle, said Bill Schuchert, 51, of Elgin.

Schuchert, who has been riding since he was 18, owns a business that restores older motorcycles from England, including Triumphs and BSAs. Most of his customers are in their 40s and 50s, and are living out a dream they've had for a long time by buying motorcycles, he said.

"Guys who wanted them when they were younger couldn't afford them back then -- and now they can."

Tribune staff reporter Amber Ellis contributed to this report

 
That's been a trend for a while now... middle-aged people buying first time bikes, usually a large bore bike. In many cases they feel they don't need the safety courses since they're older... and that's a mistake. I'm guessing a large percentage of the wrecks involve alcohol... a bigger mistake. If I hadn't started riding when I was 15, and had never been bitten by the bike bug, I don't think I'd start now. People simply don't pay attention when they drive nowadays.
Good points made here.

And... people riding faster that their skill level, no protective equipment, etc. etc.

There are a lot more motorcycles on the road today that when the "trend" began, so naturally there are going to be more accidents involving them.

This and almost everyone drives at least 10mph over the posted speed limit - motorcycles and cagers - which adds to reaction time and stopping distance.

Too many other fators involved to say "older riders" accounts for the increase.

 
Can't conclude that deaths among over-45 riders increased disproportionately, since only the total number of registered bikes was cited. We need to know how the number of riders over-45 also increased for those two years. Nice example of data selection to sensationalize an issue. It may be that the death rate of older riders HAS risen disproportionately to the rise in the number of older riders, but the data in the article don't show that.

 
Can't conclude that deaths among over-45 riders increased disproportionately, since only the total number of registered bikes was cited. We need to know how the number of riders over-45 also increased for those two years. Nice example of data selection to sensationalize an issue. It may be that the death rate of older riders HAS risen disproportionately to the rise in the number of older riders, but the data in the article don't show that.
+1

Only one 45+ is cited in the article. The other was a 40 year old former Marine. According to my math (specious, though it may be), 40 is not mid-forties. And what about the cop, was he among the 38 percent trained and mid-forties or fifties? I think these authors are desperate for some sort of stereotype or a trend more than they're interested in reporting the facts.

 
Link

The 2006 report.

The top of page 16 is interesting. The <20 and >59 age groups seem to be the safest. And, it is clear the 50-59 group is on the rise.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Link
The 2006 report.

The top of page 16 is interesting. The <20 and >59 age groups seem to be the safest. And, it is clear the 50-59 group is on the rise.
The graph on page 25 is interesting. It shows that the absolute numbers of fatalities have increased over the years in essentially all age groups, especially since 1997 - 1999. The slopes of the lines for the under-20 group and the over-59 group were somewhat flatter than the other age groups (although still increasing in recent years), otherwise the rate of increase for all groups was about the same. Still, we need to know how the numbers of riders in each age group have changed over the years to know if these trends represent anything other than simply changes in the numbers of riders. Chart 8 on page 26 is interesting, but again, we don't know how the actual number of riders in each age group has changed. Remember, the greatest general poulation increase during these years has been in the 50 to 59 year group, and that is clearly reflected in the relative fatalities per age group as a percentage of the total fatalities. Overall, more riders are getting killed. There are more riders. Hard to conclude much other than that without comparing the percentages of owners by age groups to the total number of owners for each year. The numbers are probably there but it will take some work to pull them out, and you would be working with data from the Motorcycle Industry Council for ownership by age versus data from the NHTSA for fatalities by age. Damn, my head hurts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just imagine that one day, an enterprising reporter will use his journalistic bias in the opposite direction.

[SIZE=18pt]SUV Drivers commiting murder of minority group[/SIZE]

Between the years of (select time frame with favorable data), a large number of vulnerable citizens have been brutally murdered by careless morons wielding lethal weapons. With nary a thought for the families and friends of their victims, these drivers rank their multi-tasking more highly than the lives of law-abiding motorcyclists, who have the misfortune to share the road with them.

It is a public outcry. SUV's should be banned. Morons should be put in jail. Health insurance should be denied to them. Polite society must cast them out.

(Enter quote from victim advocacy group aka AMA).

I'm sure others can flesh out this article, in the same spirit as some of the other BS articles that actually get published.

Jill

 
Its pretty easy to understand the stats when i pull up to the market at the top of MT Storm on a hot summer afternoon and find a dozen HD riders in Tee's slammin a couple cases in the parkinglot <_<

Lets see.... dehydrated, drunk, ridin a tank and no protection.... you do the math

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting thing about the article, which I read twice to make sure I didn't miss something, is that only one of the fatalities cited was a single vehicle accident, the "concrete divider" death. All the others were riders killed by vehicles hitting THEM.

Kind of shoots holes in the article's banner "Bikers gaining in years, crashes...Age, inexperience may be behind jump in fatalities".

While the facts and statistics about older biker deaths is probably true, I can't help but feel the article was written with a slight smell of sensationalism to stink the place up.

What does "It's unknown at this point exactly what is driving the upward trend in fatal crashes, traffic experts say. But it appears likely the increasing number of older riders taking to the road for the first time has something to do with it." have to do with getting killed by a cage? It wouldn't matter if you were a first time rider or a 40 year veteran when a drunk in a pickup runs into you.

Don't get me wrong...there probably IS a correlation between age and motorcycle fatalities, but I'd hazard a guess it would have more to do with dispensable income, the search for leisure-time activities, fulfilled dreams of misspent youth and quality of product compared to what was available when our parents were 45+. We're a MUCH different generation...our parents generation's primary goals were having children and paying for a home on an $8000 annual income.

In My Humble Opinion, fairly typical newspaper misrepresentation of ALL the facts. :****: 'em

 
I can't argue with the stats, as I have not read them, but I have to conclude from the article posted above that: it was a pretty piss poor article. Its examples might show older riders are dying, but they don't support the theory(s) as to why.

I don't see how getting killed when you got hit in the ass by another vehicle, or from one that made a turn in front of you, has anything to do with age. Sure speed, lack of training or age may have had something to do with the one accident, but getting hit by a drunk/drugged driver has nothing to do with biker's age.

And, unless I am mistaken, the cop surely was highly trained, and training didn't save him-- old or not.

Amber and her co contributors need to do a better job connecting the dots, in my opinion.

B)

 
I can't argue with the stats, as I have not read them, but I have to conclude from the article posted above that: it was a pretty piss poor article. Its examples might show older riders are dying, but they don't support the theory(s) as to why.
I don't see how getting killed when you got hit in the ass by another vehicle, or from one that made a turn in front of you, has anything to do with age. Sure speed, lack of training or age may have had something to do with the one accident, but getting hit by a drunk/drugged driver has nothing to do with biker's age.

And, unless I am mistaken, the cop surely was highly trained, and training didn't save him-- old or not.

Amber and her co contributors need to do a better job connecting the dots, in my opinion.

B)
One hypothesis is that older riders have a greater probability of becoming a fatality statistic if seriously injured compared to younger riders (younger may be stronger, heal better, less pre-existing chronic illnesses to complicate things, etc). This makes some sense, although it is just speculation.

 
Top