One opinion:I have questions regarding amber light lenses and protocols, please:
Why did I go $40 for Clearwater amber lenses?
Whose is better served by these?
Why is white lens not better than amber?
What protocols, if any, are used, and when?
Thanks for reading, and for your answers if you can see me now!
BTW, I love these lights last two years. Yeehaw!!!!
I wasn't sure of legal limits but I have never been questioned about the two regular headlights plus mirror-mounted Clearwater "Ericas" (very bright if on full power) plus fork-mounted "Glendas" with amber lenses. I haven't read the statute but I expect nobody would say anything as long as you aren't being an ******* - running them on full power in traffic. (I have never been stopped or questioned for the lighting on my bike.) I run the Ericas at minimum unless high beam is on and they are switched so I can turn them off completely. I don't have covers for them. (Do you have a link to the statute?)More than two headlights and amber lenses (other than turn indicators) on a motorcycle are both actually illegal in Canada under the CMVSS. If driven on a public road, they must be fitted with a secure opaque cover. Since the CMVSS closely mimics the FMVSS, I suspect the same is true in the US.
Yamaha had to recall a few models in the early 80's and retrofit the yellow fog lamp with a white auxilliary lamp due to this.
the amber colour will make you stand out
amber lenses make you more conspicuous
Thank you, all. I'll keep the amber lenses on for the perception of my highest visibility to others. It's all about me and my perky lumens. My next efforts will be illuminated the backside.I like that my bike might be differentiated
Canadian Motor Vehicles Safety Standards, Section 108, revision 7, S10.17 (Motorcycle Headlighting Systems) and table 1-c (Required lamps and reflective devices, All Motorcycles). This is the standard referenced in C.R.C., c. 1038 (Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations) which was enacted under the authority of the Statues of Canada 1993, c. 16 (Motor Vehicle Safety Act).(Do you have a link to the statute?)
Thank you. I will look it up for the details. I still intend to run with the regular headlights, mirror-mounted auxiliary and the fork mounted (amber) lights - at least until someone tells me I can't. I don't do a lot of riding at night but when I do, the Ericas are fantastic. During the day, being seen is critical.Canadian Motor Vehicles Safety Standards, Section 108, revision 7, S10.17 (Motorcycle Headlighting Systems) and table 1-c (Required lamps and reflective devices, All Motorcycles). This is the standard referenced in C.R.C., c. 1038 (Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations) which was enacted under the authority of the Statues of Canada 1993, c. 16 (Motor Vehicle Safety Act).
Now, obviously our Canadian statutes and regulations have no force in the US. However, the CMVSS is based on and (with very few exceptions) harmonized with the US FMVSS -- the section numbering is even harmonized between the two. They are generally pretty much identical, with the Canadian version using metric equivalents of US measurements. So I assume that there is some US statute somewhere that references the FMVSS and that the FMVSS has the same basic requirement. But I haven't fallen down that particular rabbit hole.
(Side note: S10.17.5 is the bit that legalizes and defines headlight modulation systems on motorcycles. If the objective is to increase conspicuousness, one could consider that system as a legal alternative.)
Bike in black
Enter your email address to join: