Hey, maybe we don't have to be so defensive? The fjr is great but it does lack a 6th gear, has a (IMHO) a clunky shifter, and is a design released in 2001 and just dabbed at since. I haven't ridden either of these two 'better' bikes, maybe they are? Motorcyclist did a major comparison test last year of the C14, FJR, RT and ST and put the FJR in 2nd place behind the C14, but gave the FJr its due, saying it had the best heat management system, was the 2nd fastest and lightests, was most like a sportbike, had the most compact chassis, cornered better and that it was the best looking of the lot. Mitch Boehm (then editor) picked it as his favorite.
Point is, these are motorcycles we are talking about, not soul less machines (with the exception of the Honda 750 nighthawk I had that truely was a soul less appliance, but it was such a damn good one I forgave it). I have a personal relationship with my bike, and have had one with every bike I've ever owned. This relationship transends the general level of greatness of the bike. This is why riders can be in love with ancient Guzzi's, Choppers incapable of turning, bikes that require an hour of maintainance for every hour ridden, and even motorized barstools.
Considering this, owning and loving the 3rd or even the 100th best bike isn't so bad, there is no need for a paper bag over our heads.
