ponyfool
Well-known member
I am not going to go into great detail, but as many of you know, my house caught fire on July 28, 2006. My primary insurance company, The Hartford, has been nothing short of spectacular! Replaced both of my vehicles that were destroyed in the driveway, and have worked with the contractor to repair the house.
The contractor puts in his bid of $180,000 to do the structural repairs. The insurance company hired a contractor to do a bid as a sort of checks and balances and said they could complete the job for less than $100,000. The insurance company quickly recognized that the company they hired was doing the low ball approach and dismissed the validity of their bid. In the end, the insurance company went over my contractor's bid with a fine tooth comb and pared it down to $170,000 due to some redundant entries on the contractor's bid. But in essence, accepted my contractor's bid at face value minus the duplicate efforts.
My contractor looked at the insurance company's proposal and said, and I quote, "We can work with those numbers."
That was in August. The insurance company says that they don't care how the $170,000 is spent, that's how much they agreed to repair, so as long as repairs are made, they'll pay up to that. Insurance adjuster even said, "If you want to leave the burned out hull and build an addition, that's fine with us." The only person we have to "check with" is our mortgage company because they still have a lien on the house and have an interest that repairs are being made.
Now, in the last couple weeks as things are starting to move along, my wife and I have a complete copy of the bid. We are going line by line removing the things we don't want the contractor to do, and using those as "credits" for the other things we are going to have the contractor do. For example, in the garage, I told the contractor not to build any cabinets to replace the ones that were there, instant credit of $6000. No replacing the Pergo flooring, credit of $4800. Install hardwoods instead of Pergo, debit of $6500. So we have these credits, etc that go back and forth.
In the end, we found roughly $28,000 in credits on the bid sheet. But then turned around and committed to $50,000 in upgrades, thus we are on the hook for $22,000 so far. Not a problem, we took out a second mortgage for $30,000, so we'll have $8000 left for unknowns.
Here's where the blood sucking comes to play and we're not sure what to do. We sit down with the "sales guy" from the contractor. We present the credits sheet to him from the insurance company's revised bid. He tells us, "Well, I was hoping to make up some of that $10,000 the insurance company took out through some of those credits you are wanting to take."
So I ask him point blank, "You agreed to the insurance company's numbers, what do you mean 'make up' the $10,000?" He said, "I never agreed to their numbers, I said I could work with them."
So now, he is expecting us to come up with $10,000 to "make up" for the insurance company's cutting of his bid, meaning he is expecting us to come up with $32,000! We only got a loan for $30,000.
We haven't had our final talk yet on the issue, but I don't think it is appropriate for him to agree to the work by saying, "work with the numbers". Any contractors out there? Is this normal?
The contractor puts in his bid of $180,000 to do the structural repairs. The insurance company hired a contractor to do a bid as a sort of checks and balances and said they could complete the job for less than $100,000. The insurance company quickly recognized that the company they hired was doing the low ball approach and dismissed the validity of their bid. In the end, the insurance company went over my contractor's bid with a fine tooth comb and pared it down to $170,000 due to some redundant entries on the contractor's bid. But in essence, accepted my contractor's bid at face value minus the duplicate efforts.
My contractor looked at the insurance company's proposal and said, and I quote, "We can work with those numbers."
That was in August. The insurance company says that they don't care how the $170,000 is spent, that's how much they agreed to repair, so as long as repairs are made, they'll pay up to that. Insurance adjuster even said, "If you want to leave the burned out hull and build an addition, that's fine with us." The only person we have to "check with" is our mortgage company because they still have a lien on the house and have an interest that repairs are being made.
Now, in the last couple weeks as things are starting to move along, my wife and I have a complete copy of the bid. We are going line by line removing the things we don't want the contractor to do, and using those as "credits" for the other things we are going to have the contractor do. For example, in the garage, I told the contractor not to build any cabinets to replace the ones that were there, instant credit of $6000. No replacing the Pergo flooring, credit of $4800. Install hardwoods instead of Pergo, debit of $6500. So we have these credits, etc that go back and forth.
In the end, we found roughly $28,000 in credits on the bid sheet. But then turned around and committed to $50,000 in upgrades, thus we are on the hook for $22,000 so far. Not a problem, we took out a second mortgage for $30,000, so we'll have $8000 left for unknowns.
Here's where the blood sucking comes to play and we're not sure what to do. We sit down with the "sales guy" from the contractor. We present the credits sheet to him from the insurance company's revised bid. He tells us, "Well, I was hoping to make up some of that $10,000 the insurance company took out through some of those credits you are wanting to take."
So I ask him point blank, "You agreed to the insurance company's numbers, what do you mean 'make up' the $10,000?" He said, "I never agreed to their numbers, I said I could work with them."
So now, he is expecting us to come up with $10,000 to "make up" for the insurance company's cutting of his bid, meaning he is expecting us to come up with $32,000! We only got a loan for $30,000.
We haven't had our final talk yet on the issue, but I don't think it is appropriate for him to agree to the work by saying, "work with the numbers". Any contractors out there? Is this normal?