FJR most common issues

Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum

Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Hill

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Location
Littleton, MA
What are the most common issues/problem areas on the Gen II & III FJR. Such as: Seat comfort, any heat issues, walking speed handling, bike weight when manually moving it around in the garage, etc.

Or please direct me to the string(s) if previously started.

 
First off Mr Hill....WELCOME to the site!

Seat is subjective.

For 500 mile or so days I think the stock seat is fine......many say different but EVERY bike I've ridden some people say the stock seat is adequate and others hate it.

Heat issues were greatly reduced with the Gen II and III.

I've ridden my 2008 in triple digit heat and it's wasn't extreme.

Keep in mind EVERY full fairing bike will give off some heat.

The FJR is a 600 plus pound bike, every 600 plus pound bike feels heavy when you're moving around the garage.

The FJR is the LIGHTEST of all the major sport tourers and it handles very well, better than most for it's size, it IS more compact than the other major sport tourers.

Maint is easier too on the FJR and the valve adjustment intervals ar the longest (26,000 many go longer) than any major sport tourer.

Buy one you won't regret it!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Compared to your ST, the FJR is lighter, faster, just as comfortable and much sexier. The stock seat is not conducive (sp?) to multiday, long days in the saddle. there are many aftermarket solutions for that.

don't worry about the heat. I have a gen1 which has a reputation for heat and it is really only noticeable on a handful of days per year. I can't see how it would be a problem on gen 2 or 3 bikes.

Its a durable machine as well. Many owners here have well over 100K miles on their FJRs.

 
Common problem: The nut between the seat and the handlebars falling off into the ditch somewhere.

Seriously...it's been posted up many times. Watch out for that one.

 
Common problem: The nut between the seat and the handlebars falling off into the ditch somewhere.

Seriously...it's been posted up many times. Watch out for that one.
Usually caused by the nut who serviced the bike forgetting to tighten it.

(click on image for larger view)



(BTDT)
NOT what I meant
wink.png
, but that will do as well.

biggrin.png


 
Common problem: The nut between the seat and the handlebars falling off into the ditch somewhere.

Seriously...it's been posted up many times. Watch out for that one.
Usually caused by the nut who serviced the bike forgetting to tighten it.

(click on image for larger view)



(BTDT)
NOT what I meant
wink.png
, but that will do as well.

biggrin.png
Ah, you mean that nut that shouldn't be tight when on a motorcycle? Think you'll find that's not FJR-specific
wink.png
.

 
I use the stock seat. My buddy TominCA has a different opinion.
I have seen you put in day after day averaging 600 miles on the FJR stock seat, and it's obvious you are numb from the waist down...or maybe from the neck up. Then again it's no surprise. I also watched you do an 8000 mile trip on a Harley Sportster with broken rear suspension. Any you still looked like a monkey humping a football.

tomtopittsburgh014_1024x680.jpg


The FJR is an improvement for you dude, even with a stock seat. Now pick up your toes.
smile.png


DSC_6174_1024x680.jpg


Living proof the stock seat works for some riders

DSC_6062_1024x680.jpg


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Main problems with Gen 1 is that the tank always needs refilling, the tires always need replacing and the fluids always need flushing. Something about directly proportional to miles ridden.

 
First off Mr Hill....WELCOME to the site!
Seat is subjective.

For 500 mile or so days I think the stock seat is fine......many say different but EVERY bike I've ridden some people say the stock seat is adequate and others hate it.

Heat issues were greatly reduced with the Gen II and III.

I've ridden my 2008 in triple digit heat and it's wasn't extreme.

Keep in mind EVERY full fairing bike will give off some heat.

The FJR is a 600 plus pound bike, every 600 plus pound bike feels heavy when you're moving around the garage.

The FJR is the LIGHTEST of all the major sport tourers and it handles very well, better than most for it's size, it IS more compact than the other major sport tourers.

Maint is easier too on the FJR and the valve adjustment intervals ar the longest (26,000 many go longer) than any major sport tourer.

Buy one you won't regret it!

Compared to your ST, the FJR is lighter, faster, just as comfortable and much sexier. The stock seat is not conducive (sp?) to multiday, long days in the saddle. there are many aftermarket solutions for that.
don't worry about the heat. I have a gen1 which has a reputation for heat and it is really only noticeable on a handful of days per year. I can't see how it would be a problem on gen 2 or 3 bikes.

Its a durable machine as well. Many owners here have well over 100K miles on their FJRs.
Thanks guys, some good info, appreciate it. I did some digging in the "Technical/Mechanical Problems" & "Common Historical Info" threads last week but could not find the kind of responses you gave here.

FWIW the ST's have a couple very common problems, such as the coolant leaks in hoses up between the V-4 heads, fixable but extremely difficult to get at. The ST seat poll shows that about 75% of us change the seat. That 75% are closely spread out among Sargent, Corbin, Russell Day Long and the Spencer Mod seats.

I'm 71 now & find my ST a tad heavy, the FJR being the "lightest of all the major sport tourers" is worth a closer look for me.

Thanks

PS: FJReady: Love you plate

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not strictly an FJR problem, the air filter makes a wonderful mouse nest.

Nest_zpsf6a73cbf.jpg


 
I use the stock seat. My buddy TominCA has a different opinion.
I've done some long days on the stock seat and find it adequate. I did 1500 miles in two days in June ( 710 + 790 ) on the stock seat. I'm sure I would have been more comfortable on something else, but I wasn't unduly uncomfortable. And I have money left for tires ;)

Anyway, I just wanted to welcome you aboard, Hill.

 
Perhaps it depends on how wide your posterior may be or your weight. I am 71 years old and 148lbs in excellent health. I can ride day rides on the stock seat with on issues. When I do 3500-4000 miles rides I use an AirHawk. You can use the AirHawk pillon which fits nicely on the rider seat and cost much less than the bloated rider seat unit. Hands down the FJR is my choice for Sport Touring. I've had BMW's and rented ST1300's...I'm sign'd up for the 2014 FJR1300ES to continue my travels.

 
If you plan to buy a new one, I would say there are no reliability issues right now.

A friend of mine had an ST 1300 but it was older than yours, I think an '06. Here are some things I remember. The saddlebags on the FJR are MUCH easier to remove and reinstall. The FJR has a small storage compartment in the fairing below the left handlebar that gets almost as hot as the same storage in the ST. The rear view mirrors are much better in the FJR. The FJR is easier to work on. The ST has a smoother engine, if you ride them back to back you will see what I mean, but the FJR is pretty smooth.

 
Top