I rode it around the 4 corners of Kansas last year, an almost 1,500 mile trip in 3 days and it is well suited for touring if you want to also travel some of the roads less traveled, i.e. gravel, etc.
That's a big part of the attraction.
Over the last year, or so, I've been reading various ride reports from folks touring down to Tierra del Fuego. Since seeing the pictures, I've been transfixed. Moreso than any other bike, folks riding down there are choosing the KLR. I figure there must be something to that. Likewise, given the vast numbers of KLRs circulating through there, I'd guess the support available to a rider with a broken down bike might be best for a KLR.
I don't want to do a commercial tour, but here are some representative pictures from a commercial tour website of the sorts of things I'd like to see first hand.
https://www.motodiscovery.com/tours/sameric...ego_photos.html
Why KLR?
Larger stock tank.
Proven bulletproof air cooled engine (less parts to break)
more aftermarket accessories available to customize it to your needs.
Those are what I gather. I also gather that it is a great in between bike. As well as the FJR fits between sport and touring, the KLR fists between dirt and street. It is neither a great dirt, or street bike, but does both better than most.
And...frankly it's cheap. I did a search on cycletrader.com of 2004 and newer KLR's. The most expensive was a 2005 in California for $5,149. It's really an incredible deal when you consider a Yamaha WR450F (not street legal yet) goes for over $7k msrp
Heck, I just found a brand new one, 2006, $5,199 out the door. Yeah, I know the Yamaha and KLR are very different bikes, but if it's an inbetween bike you want, the KLR is probably the best value on the road.