Gah, man, you didn't mention the Gilera strut type front end! (It's basically the same as Cannondale's "lefty" fork, and about as useless.) The fact that BMW invented the telescopic fork or BMW's first "anti-dive" fork, the leading link.
BTW, BMW's "duolever" suspension has been known for decades as the Hossack. (Shame on them for stealing it and changing the name!)
After the Tesi and Hossack, I think my favorite fork is the Motocysz, not just because it has much less unsprung weight but it uses roller bearings instead of plain bearings in the sliders.
Linky to very not small picture.
One thing I'd categorize as a correction, though, is that you said it matters if the forks are sprung differently. The loading on the fork bushings is such a tiny tiny fraction of what they're designed to withstand (braking) as to not matter at all. Many bikes have springs in one fork and damping in the other, or compression in one fork and rebound in the other. You probably won't find that done on the MotoGP grid, but I don't think they'd let it loose on the public if it were going to cause wrecks and subsequent lawsuits.
And if you really want the best example in history of how not to make a shaft drive system, Google the Laverda V6 endurance racer.
That's the later version with the longer swingarm and telescoping driveshaft. I'm too lazy to hunt down the early bike where the swingarm was the same length as the driveshaft.