"Right of way" only applies when you have a bigger vehicle than the ones that may violate it. If you act like you are entitled to a right-of-way on your motorcycle, you are relying on "Pure *** Luck". JMHO, YMMV.Among the (Hurt Report's) major findings were that...two-thirds of motorcycle crashes involved cars and two-thirds of those accidents occurred when a car driver failed to see the motorcycle and violated the cyclist's right of way.
Sure, but the report is trying to make the point that the car was in the wrong, that it wasn't the biker doing something stupid, and that car drivers are blind ignorant fucktards. As opposed to something like "the bike passed on a double yellow in a blind corner" where it's "yeah, he deserved a smackin' already""Right of way" only applies when you have a bigger vehicle than the ones that may violate it. If you act like you are entitled to a right-of-way on your motorcycle, you are relying on "Pure *** Luck". JMHO, YMMV.Among the (Hurt Report's) major findings were that...two-thirds of motorcycle crashes involved cars and two-thirds of those accidents occurred when a car driver failed to see the motorcycle and violated the cyclist's right of way.
+1! Godspeed Harry...we all owe you a debt of gratitude. Rest in peace.RIP, Dr. Hurt. Your research and its publication are likely the reason I'm still above ground. From the first time I read a synopsis of your conclusions, I've approached every intersection and car entering a roadway with an eye toward my escape route.
Best info I ever stumbled upon. God Speed Dr. Hurt.
Enter your email address to join: