Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Off-Topic Discussion
Off-Topic Discussion
Has anyone else tried Chrome?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="03HiYoSilver" data-source="post: 483366" data-attributes="member: 3137"><p>Some excerpts from ComputerWorld:</p><p></p><p>What about its memory footprint? Is it as big a pig as IE8 Beta 2? Bigger, according to Craig Barth of Devil Mountain Software, who just ran Chrome through the same performance test that he used on Monday to name IE8 as "epically porcine."</p><p></p><p>"What we found was shocking," Barth said. "We discovered that it is Google Chrome, not Internet Explorer 8, that is the true memory consumption leader."</p><p></p><p>By his numbers, Chrome came very close to matching IE8 Beta 2 on peak memory use (324MB for Chrome, 332MB for IE8), but used more memory on average (267MB for Chrome vs. 211MB for IE8).</p><p></p><p>Barth attributed the heftier memory appetite of Chrome to its multiprocess tabbing model, where each tab is actually a separate iteration of the browser. "Its use of that model, which, according to Google, helps isolate failures and protect complex Web applications means that it will always use more memory than Firefox, IE 7 and similar, single-process browsers," he said.</p><p></p><p>Their Review and Details: <a href="https://blogs.computerworld.com/chrome_review" target="_blank">https://blogs.computerworld.com/chrome_review</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="03HiYoSilver, post: 483366, member: 3137"] Some excerpts from ComputerWorld: What about its memory footprint? Is it as big a pig as IE8 Beta 2? Bigger, according to Craig Barth of Devil Mountain Software, who just ran Chrome through the same performance test that he used on Monday to name IE8 as "epically porcine." "What we found was shocking," Barth said. "We discovered that it is Google Chrome, not Internet Explorer 8, that is the true memory consumption leader." By his numbers, Chrome came very close to matching IE8 Beta 2 on peak memory use (324MB for Chrome, 332MB for IE8), but used more memory on average (267MB for Chrome vs. 211MB for IE8). Barth attributed the heftier memory appetite of Chrome to its multiprocess tabbing model, where each tab is actually a separate iteration of the browser. "Its use of that model, which, according to Google, helps isolate failures and protect complex Web applications means that it will always use more memory than Firefox, IE 7 and similar, single-process browsers," he said. Their Review and Details: [URL="https://blogs.computerworld.com/chrome_review"]https://blogs.computerworld.com/chrome_review[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Off-Topic Discussion
Off-Topic Discussion
Has anyone else tried Chrome?
Top
