guyver60
Active member
I am interested in those who have insurance coverage on bikes that are old, sentimental, collector bikes, in storage, or not being ridden for whatever reason. Even though a bike may not be plated and ridden, there are a variety of reasons for having coverage in case of theft or damage. The reason I ask is that State Farm apparently doesn't like to cover a bike that is safely tucked away in a garage and not exposed to to more risks of being on the road and parked out in various locations.
l have an 88 Honda Magna that is in great shape except the carbs (all 4) need to be cleaned. It's one of those things I haven't gotten to, so I dropped coverage down to comprehensive. For the past few years, the State Farm underwriters have inquired once or twice a year about the status of this bike. Recently they gave me an ultimatum to either put full coverage on it or drop all coverage. I don't get it. I have an old car that I don't drive, but have only comprehensive coverage on it. I kept this car and cover it, because it's cheaper to do this and receive a multicar discount than not have a second vehicle. The agent suggested this and the underwriters are apparently fine with it, but they really have a problem with covering an old motorcycle that is not being ridden.
The local agent and company have been good to me over the years, and I have quite a few various items covered through them. However, I'm looking to switch companies, since they have such an issue providing comprehensive coverage on an old bike.
If you have coverage on bikes not being ridden, I would like to hear what company you are with. Thanks!
l have an 88 Honda Magna that is in great shape except the carbs (all 4) need to be cleaned. It's one of those things I haven't gotten to, so I dropped coverage down to comprehensive. For the past few years, the State Farm underwriters have inquired once or twice a year about the status of this bike. Recently they gave me an ultimatum to either put full coverage on it or drop all coverage. I don't get it. I have an old car that I don't drive, but have only comprehensive coverage on it. I kept this car and cover it, because it's cheaper to do this and receive a multicar discount than not have a second vehicle. The agent suggested this and the underwriters are apparently fine with it, but they really have a problem with covering an old motorcycle that is not being ridden.
The local agent and company have been good to me over the years, and I have quite a few various items covered through them. However, I'm looking to switch companies, since they have such an issue providing comprehensive coverage on an old bike.
If you have coverage on bikes not being ridden, I would like to hear what company you are with. Thanks!