Motorcycle safety study is underway in Los Angeles

Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum

Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

tcfjr

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
850
Reaction score
64
Location
Apple Valley, CA
From this article in today's Los Angeles Times:

https://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-mo...0,6000706.story

Motorcycle safety study is underway in Los Angeles

The $3.1-million study, being conducted by Oklahoma State University researchers, is looking at why crash deaths have soared in the last decade. Some say the sample size of 300 crashes is too small.

--

The first major study of motorcycle crashes in nearly 30 years is underway in Los Angeles, as researchers attempt to pinpoint why resultant fatalities have soared over the last decade to constitute 14% of all roadway deaths, despite the fact that motorcycles account for less than 1% of vehicle miles traveled.

There are plenty of theories to explain the increase: The number of motorcycles on the road rose from 3.9 million in 1998 to 7.1 million in 2007; motorcycles are more powerful than they used to be; riders are older, now averaging 41 years of age; and many states have repealed their helmet laws.

But there are no clear answers.

The last in-depth investigation of motorcycle crashes in the United States -- the Hurt study -- was conducted through USC and released in 1981. Efforts to update that information have been stymied by funding issues.

Earlier this month, a new study was greenlighted by the U.S. Department of Transportation, but it's a scaled-down version of what was originally planned, and a leading industry-backed safety group says the sample size will be too small to properly resolve the questions.

The National Transportation Safety Board originally recommended that the study include a sample size of 900 to 1,200 crashes. The Hurt study examined 900 crashes. But researchers at Oklahoma State University, tapped to conduct the new study, said use of such a large sample would cost $10 million to $12 million, far exceeding the federal government's $4.2-million estimate.

As of Oct. 1, the study was moving forward with a sample size of 300 crashes.

"The motorcycle crash rate for injuries and deaths has increased every year for the past 10 years, so it was critical to get this study underway," said Cathy St. Denis, spokeswoman for the Federal Highway Administration. "It will be one of the most comprehensive studies to be done in years and will help prevent future crashes."

The $3.1-million study includes $2 million from the highway reauthorization bill, $500,000 from the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration, $500,000 from individual states and $100,000 from the American Motorcyclist Assn.

The Motorcycle Safety Foundation, a nonprofit group that develops rider training courses used by most states and is funded by major manufacturers such as Honda and Harley-Davidson, had offered $2.8 million in 2007 for a study if it included a sample size of 900 crashes.

The group refused to contribute to the scaled-down study because it "will not provide adequate sampling to achieve appropriate statistical significance and may not provide new insights," the organization said in a statement last week. "This limited study will likely lend only a minimal degree of validation to the major, already known contributing motorcycle crash factors."

There are about 100,000 motorcycle crashes in the United States each year, 5,290 of which resulted in death in 2008, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. According to the Motorcycle Safety Foundation, which draws heavily on findings from the 1981 Hurt study, major crash factors include alcohol involvement and rider error, such as over-braking and running wide in a curve.

So far, data from 53 crashes have been gathered as part of the study's pilot, which kicked off in Los Angeles last December to test data collection procedures and which concluded earlier this year. That crash data will be included in the official study of 300 crashes, which is also taking place in L.A.

Preliminary results from the study will be available in a year.

 
Thanks for this -- I am sure the results will be heavily discussed, but it's a bummer to see the scope of the study is already scaled back.

I wonder what the margin of error is going to be on these findings due to the smaller dataset.

 
I'm glad to see this finally happening, although the scaled down data set may very well (and probably will) skew the results.

 
Trying to understand 100,000 crashes a year from a 300 crash sample size won't be conclusive, and in the worst case scenario, confuse riders and policy makers into responding incorrectly to the findings. You simply cannot generalize that much with the number of variables involved, IMHO. The only hope is that money is found in comparative dribs and drabs over the years for multiple small studies, and then a meta-analysis might be attempted. Even if a huge correlation between crash severity and a variable (sat, alcohol use or type of helmet wear) was found, special interests can rightfully argue the sample was skewed due to not being representative of the whole. I Also hope rural crashes get included, not just urban ones in LA. Bummer overall.

 
my 2 cents... I've always wondered why, (since it is legal to "lane share" in L.A.) the double yellow line between the diamond lane next lane couldn't be separated by about 18 more inches, and an awareness campaign implemented making it safer for motorcycles to travel. I don't think there's enough being done to make it safer for the increased number of bikes. Here in L.A., most of the cars only have one person in them. If it were safer for bikes, there could be more bikes, cutting down on road size/fuel used/carbon footprint of vehicle build. Why does it always seem to lead to restrictions on motorcycles, rather than the large non-fuel efficient cars. ........ Oh yeah, there's more money and political power held by car makers and the gas companies!

 
Let me guess. Many crashed are caused by drivers making a left turn in front of an oncoming motorcycle... Oh, I did not see it...There ya go, free research.

 
From this article in today's Los Angeles Times:
https://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-mo...0,6000706.story

Motorcycle safety study is underway in Los Angeles

The $3.1-million study, being conducted by Oklahoma State University researchers, is looking at why crash deaths have soared in the last decade. Some say the sample size of 300 crashes is too small.

--

The first major study of motorcycle crashes in nearly 30 years is underway in Los Angeles, as researchers attempt to pinpoint why resultant fatalities have soared over the last decade to constitute 14% of all roadway deaths, despite the fact that motorcycles account for less than 1% of vehicle miles traveled.

There are plenty of theories to explain the increase: The number of motorcycles on the road rose from 3.9 million in 1998 to 7.1 million in 2007; motorcycles are more powerful than they used to be; riders are older, now averaging 41 years of age; and many states have repealed their helmet laws.
They always quote the same information about demographics.

Has anyone compared how many more cars there are on the road? How many unlicensed drivers of those cars? What percentage of automobile driver are driving while under the influence of prescription drugs, alcohol, illegal substances or talking on cell phones?

If we are talking about single-motorcycle incidents, it will be interesting to find out:

How many were "DUI"?

How many were unlicensed?

How many had never taken an instructional motorcycle riding course?

How many had never read a book about safely operating their motorcycle?

It would also be interesting if the methods and data will be available for interpretation before the politicians or insurance agencies have a chance to manipulate the data to fit any agenda they might have.

 
Has anyone compared how many more cars there are on the road? How many unlicensed drivers of those cars? What percentage of automobile driver are driving while under the influence of prescription drugs, alcohol, illegal substances or talking on cell phones?
As far as I know, this information has never been gathered but would be extremely usefull to know. At least I've never seen it. Is there a way to see what the data is that is being gathered by the Oklahoma group?

 
Top