[ Being a state trooper, that was his job! He has a duty to try to enforce the law. Just because your chief has tied your department's hands, don't pass the same judgement on this officer. Unfortunately, when we sign up for the job, there is chance that we could be killed.
Sixteen years on the job with the State Police in my state. I don't have a Chief, I have a Colonel.
And yes, he should have known better. It was a ******* traffic violation - is that worth your life? Was it worth his? How about the motorcyclist, or the bystanders in the other cars? Not for traffic - not ever for traffic. Pursuit for traffic violations is reckless and stupid. His senseless death just furthers that truth.
If I were to chase a shooting suspect, on foot, and got shot by said suspect, would I get the same commentary, "I should have known better?"
No, that's completely different - and if you are a Trooper (or any sort of cop) you know it.
Been an officer for 18 years. Doesn't matter if it's a traffic violation or not. The guy was doing his job. We'll apparently have to agree to disagree. I think though that the officer was doing what he was suppose to do, and I still think you are wrong. I do and will chase a person for a traffic violation. It's their legal responsibility to pull over.
If other drivers see him not do anything what kind of message does that send to the motoring public?
As for the others info, I can only speak for the law here in CA. If a person is being actively pursued and the officer gets hurt or worse, then the law looks at it as though the suspect is responsible. In the eyes of the law, it's no different than killing a person while committing another crime. Believe it or not, knowingly running from the cops is a felony.
Rick
Rick