Posting up at 80

[Scab]

I think I have been misunderstood. My reference to "consider the audience" was not meant to refer to "being considerate of the audience" in a PC kind of way, but a "consider to whom you speak" kind of way. In that reference, I think your photo was selling to the wrong audience. While we may look upon some squidly behavior in a romantic whistful way, I think that maturity generally reigns upon the membership of this forum and good judgement rules the day. Does that mean we don't wish otherwise? Hell, no.

In other words, you're preachin' to the choir. We already get it. No need for the gross picture while we indulge in a little fantasy imagination. It equates to slipping a picture of Rosie O'Donnel into the centerfold position of certain magazines. You just don't do a brother like that.

 

[trimmantom]

Well on a lighter note here I think Carver should be removed as CEO of the Candy Butt Assoc.

Does anyone second the motion?

 

[Mrs. Scab]

Second...

 

[Cdogman]

I dont think there are many here that do not understand the danger of the Bikes we ride. I ride fast, often well above triple digits, hanging off, and pegs draggin anyway. I know it is dangerous. It is a risk I have chosen to take.

What really gets me is to be preached to........... I phuckin hate that. I respect your views, I don't like **** like that shoved in my face tho so someone can feel all good about saving my high speed ***.

I hope you can respect my views then as well........

Peace out!!

 

[Clark Kent]

I dont think there are many here that do not understand the danger of the Bikes we ride. I ride fast, often well above triple digits, hanging off, and pegs draggin anyway. I know it is dangerous. It is a risk I have chosen to take.
What really gets me is to be preached to........... I phuckin hate that. I respect your views, I don't like **** like that shoved in my face tho so someone can feel all good about saving my high speed ***.

I hope you can respect my views then as well........

Peace out!!

Agreed. The photo can be interpreted by each viewer in his or her own way.

CK

 

[Clark Kent]

I think I have been misunderstood. My reference to "consider the audience" was not meant to refer to "being considerate of the audience" in a PC kind of way, but a "consider to whom you speak" kind of way. In that reference, I think your photo was selling to the wrong audience. While we may look upon some squidly behavior in a romantic whistful way, I think that maturity generally reigns upon the membership of this forum and good judgement rules the day. Does that mean we don't wish otherwise? Hell, no.
In other words, you're preachin' to the choir. We already get it. No need for the gross picture while we indulge in a little fantasy imagination. It equates to slipping a picture of Rosie O'Donnel into the centerfold position of certain magazines. You just don't do a brother like that.

If I was preaching to the choris, there would have been no thread about the wheelies and wanting to do the same.

The only thing that triggered the posting of the photo were commments from choris members who haven't been coming to practice and therefore are not singing the same song that most of the choris members are singing.

To change the subject, look what my posting the photo of the "FAT" young lady has done for her!

Her sister also saw the post and changed her life style. SEE THIS THREAD WORKED!

CK

[

 

[Scab]

Much better. We cool.

 

[Clark Kent]

Much better. We cool.

Everyone on this site is Cool!

Maybe not as cool as you and I, but still the same, cool!

CK

 

[evilmedic13]

This guy did the same thing!

But he lost!

CK

[SIZE=18pt]That's why you always wear clean underwear and match your shoes![/SIZE]

 

[Scab]

[SIZE=18pt]That's why you always wear clean underwear and match your shoes![/SIZE]

Now that's just wrong. :blink:

You owe us 3 "hot chick" photos for that.

 

[evilmedic13]

[SIZE=18pt]That's why you always wear clean underwear and match your shoes![/SIZE]

Now that's just wrong. :blink:

You owe us 3 "hot chick" photos for that.

Crikey that was fast! Gimmee a minute I'll go get some.

Here's 5 for the wait. We kool now? Don't want any angry PM rom the Mrs. Scab for disappointing you.

 

[Cdogman]

LMAO Bigg ................ Yea we cool............ Slow poke............. ROFL

 

[Scab]

Here's 5 for the wait. We kool now? Don't want any angry PM rom the Mrs. Scab for disappointing you.

This thread just keeps getting better...

 

[Cdogman]

Naw we dont compete.... we each ride our own bikes............. THAT keeps us alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Rickster]

Really this is quite an interesting gore photo.

Why did s/he have an Alpinestar boot on one foot, and a sneaker on the other?

 

[Clark Kent]

Really this is quite an interesting gore photo.
Why did s/he have an Alpinestar boot on one foot, and a sneaker on the other?

The 10 reasons for the sneeker!

1. To shift better.

2. Athletes foot.

3. Could only afford one Alpinestar.

4. Hurt one foot in another accident.

5. did not have two socks of the same color.

6. Did not have two socks.

7. Had a rider who had sneekers on.

8. Hit a person with sneekers on.

9. Sneeker was already there. (roadside trash)

10.-----Who Knows. (puts photo in question)

CK

 

[Scab]

Perhaps the shoes were in a tankbag for later??

 

[Cdogman]

Several other things I noticed in the picture.

Where is all the blood

Skid marks lead right up to the body? but no blood?

How do they know if he was going 175. He is dead and unless they had him on radar no one knows for sure

The one boot is turned around in the second photo from the first. Why?

At least he had good gear, Aria, and whatnot

 

[Scab]

Those are not skid marks. Those are HIS marks. I would imagine from being dragged over to the side for clean-up. You know, consolidation of the scatter.

 

[Cdogman]

Those are not skid marks. Those are HIS marks. I would imagine from being dragged over to the side for clean-up. You know, consolidation of the scatter.

Up, Yer right. I sit corrected