Phugedaboudet
Well-known member
My stock Bridgestone tires were worn scary-bad on the front in less than 5800 miles. The rear was showing the wear bars for a couple of weeks too. These tires see commute daily over San Jose's roads and highways (tar snakes, grooved pavement for 5 mile sections, etc). I don't drag the pegs (clipped em a few times) and have never taken it for a track day.
The yahoo FJR group I'm in recommended the Me880s as a suitably sticky and longer wearing replacement, but the rear tire is not available in the 180/55 size but in a 170/60. Group members who actually do trackdays said they didn't notice an appreciable difference in traction with the narrower width, and reported much better mileage (over 8K in harder riding).
So Sunday, my buddy leads me on a 170 mile lower Bay area excursion, which brought us thru Norris Canyon area and along Calaveras Road-some of the tightest curved roads I've ever swung the FJR around.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calaveras_Road
Tires functioned without a hitch and I found that handling felt "lighter"-it was easier to transition from one lean to another with the narrower back tire, and cornering felt more confident with the stiffer sidewalls. Caught the footpegs a few times and scuffed all the way up to the chicken stripes, the tires didn't scare me once.
The stiffer sidewall makes the ride on highways at speed noticeably rougher-I had my rear shock set to the 2 up setting, but had my bags off in case of accident. For longer rides I'll need to switch it back I think.
So now the only remaining test is longevity. If they give me 8K then I'll be perfectly satisfied.
BTW, was it any of you on the 08 FJR (Black) headed south (towards downtown) on I-280 Sunday afternoon? I was the guy following the maniac on the bright yellow and black XJ going the opposite direction at less than legal speeds
The yahoo FJR group I'm in recommended the Me880s as a suitably sticky and longer wearing replacement, but the rear tire is not available in the 180/55 size but in a 170/60. Group members who actually do trackdays said they didn't notice an appreciable difference in traction with the narrower width, and reported much better mileage (over 8K in harder riding).
So Sunday, my buddy leads me on a 170 mile lower Bay area excursion, which brought us thru Norris Canyon area and along Calaveras Road-some of the tightest curved roads I've ever swung the FJR around.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calaveras_Road
Tires functioned without a hitch and I found that handling felt "lighter"-it was easier to transition from one lean to another with the narrower back tire, and cornering felt more confident with the stiffer sidewalls. Caught the footpegs a few times and scuffed all the way up to the chicken stripes, the tires didn't scare me once.
The stiffer sidewall makes the ride on highways at speed noticeably rougher-I had my rear shock set to the 2 up setting, but had my bags off in case of accident. For longer rides I'll need to switch it back I think.
So now the only remaining test is longevity. If they give me 8K then I'll be perfectly satisfied.
BTW, was it any of you on the 08 FJR (Black) headed south (towards downtown) on I-280 Sunday afternoon? I was the guy following the maniac on the bright yellow and black XJ going the opposite direction at less than legal speeds