FJR1300
FJR Pilot
Um... you just need to add the correct IMG tags to get the image to display.Hope this helps.... sorry, the photog will prolly not load. You may have to visit the site on your own.
Um... you just need to add the correct IMG tags to get the image to display.Hope this helps.... sorry, the photog will prolly not load. You may have to visit the site on your own.
No, Groo....Um, in case you missed it, I posted a link to self cancelling signals halfway down page 1 of this thread.Self canceling devices can be had, however. But, you'll have to seach other bike sites other than THIS one.
I am also a habitual masher. Works for me. But, I'm only saying that as an excuse to interrupt the thread with...I find that I mash the cancel button, continuously, impulsively. Almost every intersection I come to I mash.
I had a '75 GT750... The "water buffalo" or "kettle". Damn, those were sweet bikes.Back in the day, when I was still working on reducing my hearing (successfully I might add) I had wired a RadioShack piezo beeper into the turn signal indicator circuit on my '75 Suzuki GT550. Worked like a champ. But I never wore earplugs then and the word iPod didn't exist.
Oh, brother.After being on this board for a while, I wasn't surprised by the unjustified beating the OP took for a very real problem (no wonder many folks are afraid to post)... but it mostly came from the same people I expected. Glad to see many came to his defense. And yes, it's a REAL problem, especially if you happen to have other bikes (or used to own them) with self-cancelling signals. And most of those 'other' bikes are either Harleys or BMWs, which have different switch gear, making it harder to get used to cancel. And yes again, we'll eventually learn to avoid letting the signals on one way or another, but one of those 'harmless' episodes could be the one that ends our lives. A non-riding driver who wants to turn left and sees a left signal 'ON' on a lonely oncoming motorcycle WILL be a problem more times than not, even if you're a cautious rider.
Perhaps one could devise a farkle to harness the energy from a teapot lid to either hit the offending turn signal...or the unaware rider in the back of the head. A well-built tempest has quite a lot of energy and could address this scourge of an issue....IT'S IMPERATIVE we have a solution to avoid leaving the signals on ANY WAY possible...
I'm guessing the reason this thread got so ugly so quickly is that the "solution to avoid leaving the signals on" is very simply toAnd finally (going back to reality), IT'S IMPERATIVE we have a solution to avoid leaving the signals on ANY WAY possible
Dickf,After being on this board for a while, I wasn't surprised by the unjustified beating the OP took for a very real problem (no wonder many folks are afraid to post)... but it mostly came from the same people I expected. Glad to see many came to his defense. And yes, it's a REAL problem, especially if you happen to have other bikes (or used to own them) with self-cancelling signals. And most of those 'other' bikes are either Harleys or BMWs, which have different switch gear, making it harder to get used to cancel. And yes again, we'll eventually learn to avoid letting the signals on one way or another, but one of those 'harmless' episodes could be the one that ends our lives. A non-riding driver who wants to turn left and sees a left signal 'ON' on a lonely oncoming motorcycle WILL be a problem more times than not, even if you're a cautious rider.
Now to a solution that hasn't been mentioned. Yes, there's something Yamaha can do folks. COPY HARLEY! At least on the '00 Harley Deuce I rented in Maui some years back, by hitting the turn signal ONCE, it'd work just like on our FJR. But if hit TWICE in succession, the self-cancelling feature kicked in; best of both worlds IMO.
The reason none of us seem to like self-cancelling signals is because no algorithm is perfect for us. But if we had the choice to deactivate it (I'd make self-cancelling the default, with a double 'click' to deactivate it), we'd only deactivate it the few instances where we know it doesn't work for us. Problem mostly solved (you still have to cancel them those few times).
And finally (going back to reality), IT'S IMPERATIVE we have a solution to avoid leaving the signals on ANY WAY possible, even if it means an ugly a$$ one like ****'s; our lives depend on it IMO. It's much more important to stay alive than to have a pretty bike. Besides, to me, most bikes with all that crap tacked on (MP3, GPS, RD, etc) look just as ugly (and make riding more dangerous IMO), but as few said already, it's your freaking bike, so do as you please. But at least being ugly in the name of safety is much more justified IMO. Later.
JC
Sorry Charlie, your facts are a wee bit off. While I'm sure the left turning cage issue is somewhat common, it's NOT the "most" common cause of fatal bike accidents. The Hurt report and several others have all clearly shown that most fatal motorcycle accidents are caused by the rider going off the road and that other vehicles aren't involved. While the rest of your post may make perfect sense, that first bit is a common erroneous belief.I agree with you that this is poor judgment by Yamaha since it is well known that most fatal bike accidents are caused by left turning cages.
Enter your email address to join: