+3 :angry:Really *special* neighbors. Once ambulatory, I'm not sure I could resist paying my "neighors" a visit and going midevil on their *****. ****.
Sorry kids....just more proof in the pudding....California attracts & as more flaks than any other states....maybe it's too much sun :blink:I think some drug testing is also called for. Lock'em up!
:assassin: Unbelieveable - I hope they are prosecuted with an applicable penality - but VERY unlikely in good ole liberal California (especially nor-cal). I hope the pursues civil damages against them as well. Jerk-offs!
And a sincere "**** YOU" to you two ignoramuses.I would expect medals to be awarded to the perpetrators by the 9th Circuit Court in good ole' Kalifornia, or is it Mexifornia...and a thorough tongue lashing to be administered to the motorcycle riders for having the nerve to 'disturb' their neighbors environment... :angry2:
Well put!!:assassin: Unbelieveable - I hope they are prosecuted with an applicable penality - but VERY unlikely in good ole liberal California (especially nor-cal). I hope the pursues civil damages against them as well. Jerk-offs!
And a sincere "**** YOU" to you two ignoramuses.I would expect medals to be awarded to the perpetrators by the 9th Circuit Court in good ole' Kalifornia, or is it Mexifornia...and a thorough tongue lashing to be administered to the motorcycle riders for having the nerve to 'disturb' their neighbors environment... :angry2:
Warchild posted this right after it happened, and it IS seriously ****** up. In my native state, you can expect this to be vigorously prosecuted by either the Santa Clara County or Santa Cruz County District Attorney's office (this is right near the border of the two counties). I wouldn't expect the slightest leniency for these ********. And unlike you two, I do know what I'm talking about -- I graduated from law school and used to practice there. In fact, my old boss, an extremely competent personal injury attorney, lives a couple miles from the described neighborhood. As to the civil case, that is a BAD place to be a defendant in that type of case. Punitive damages under Civil Code section 3294 appear to be almost a slam dunk on those facts, and juries there are anything but sympathetic to that sort of ****. Before that happens, though, I'd expect these fuckers to live for a while in state prison. In the civil case, expect a California jury to award compensatory and punitive damages that will likely put these ******** in the poor house once they return from public housing. BTW, getting any relief from the bankruptcy court from a judgment based upon an intentional tort is almost impossible.
+1 And that would be Justice :yahoo:Warchild posted this right after it happened, and it IS seriously ****** up. In my native state, you can expect this to be vigorously prosecuted by either the Santa Clara County or Santa Cruz County District Attorney's office (this is right near the border of the two counties). I wouldn't expect the slightest leniency for these ********. And unlike you two, I do know what I'm talking about -- I graduated from law school and used to practice there. In fact, my old boss, an extremely competent personal injury attorney, lives a couple miles from the described neighborhood. As to the civil case, that is a BAD place to be a defendant in that type of case. Punitive damages under Civil Code section 3294 appear to be almost a slam dunk on those facts, and juries there are anything but sympathetic to that sort of ****. Before that happens, though, I'd expect these fuckers to live for a while in state prison. In the civil case, expect a California jury to award compensatory and punitive damages that will likely put these ******** in the poor house once they return from public housing. BTW, getting any relief from the bankruptcy court from a judgment based upon an intentional tort is almost impossible.
Let's keep on the subject of the assault and not take political potshots at California lest one of us admins have to take you aside about Board Guideline #2
You want to talk about the political ramifications of this specific act--that's fine, but don't use it as a springboard for some other rant.
Thank you.
The Management
Aw, come on now, a little teaser wouldn't hurt anyone, would it?I used to live on the road for 10 years, I know all involved. It's WAY more involved than the paper makes out, you'd think the rider was a poor innocent rider from the article! NO WAY was it right to do what they did but there's WAY WAY more to the story. And no I'm not saying more !
Aw, come on now, a little teaser wouldn't hurt anyone, would it?I used to live on the road for 10 years, I know all involved. It's WAY more involved than the paper makes out, you'd think the rider was a poor innocent rider from the article! NO WAY was it right to do what they did but there's WAY WAY more to the story. And no I'm not saying more !
I rarely believe anything I read in the SF Chronicle.
Enter your email address to join: