learnin4life
Well-known member
Can a question be any more subjective? But, that is the point. I've upgraded the stocker with a new Hyperpro spring (and removed the hard-soft lever), and believe I may be able to notice a difference in some riding situations. nevertheless my question really goes to whether there is a less subjective way of determining the need for a real upgrade, e.g., Penske, Ohlins, Wilburs, etc. I ride only about 10 to 12K a year now, but expect to do more riding after I retire in a couple years. Can someone tell me how they made a determination that their FJR required a shock replacement based on factors they observed while riding?
I'm struggling to articulate the real issue which is revolves around whether spending $1K+ on a shock result in a meaningful difference in ride quality for someone that may not be that sensitive to minor, subtle changes in ride. Its not like I can go around a track and sense that 1 click of rebound, or whatever. If I had some objective criteria to go by that others have experienced, then I would be in a position to tell myself, Oh, this is what such and such said their bike did when they got to a certain level of riding that eclipsed the capability of the stocker. I don't doubt that the statements made by so many on this site are true and accurate translations of their experience of what a big difference changing shocks made. However, I don't want to plunk down the money, then miss out on the "aha" moment others have talked about. Plus, when I get down to it, I may not be a good enough rider to tell the difference despite multiple track days and training classes--which are a ton of fun.
I would appreciate feedback from anyone caring to share their objective criteria that let them determine for themselves a new, upgraded shock was necessary for their bike?
I'm struggling to articulate the real issue which is revolves around whether spending $1K+ on a shock result in a meaningful difference in ride quality for someone that may not be that sensitive to minor, subtle changes in ride. Its not like I can go around a track and sense that 1 click of rebound, or whatever. If I had some objective criteria to go by that others have experienced, then I would be in a position to tell myself, Oh, this is what such and such said their bike did when they got to a certain level of riding that eclipsed the capability of the stocker. I don't doubt that the statements made by so many on this site are true and accurate translations of their experience of what a big difference changing shocks made. However, I don't want to plunk down the money, then miss out on the "aha" moment others have talked about. Plus, when I get down to it, I may not be a good enough rider to tell the difference despite multiple track days and training classes--which are a ton of fun.
I would appreciate feedback from anyone caring to share their objective criteria that let them determine for themselves a new, upgraded shock was necessary for their bike?