radman
R.I.P. Our Motorcycling Friend
From the limey forum-report by Chaz
The Thread
One mans opinion anyway.anyone interested in the 550 should save their money. Got mine last week and am terribly disappointed. I don't know who designed the software that is loaded on the GPS, but it seems very unlikely that they were long distance motorcycle riders.I have recently used a 276C and should have kept it. The 550 doesn't have dual odometers, so unless you add up all of the resets, which I do at every gas stop so that I know how far I go on each tank of gas, you don't have a total mileage at the end of the trip. the gas gauge function built into the 550 ask you upon set up how many miles you can go on a tank of gas, and then on the data screen give you a bar graph showing the gas going down, rather than showing the number of miles you've traveled on that tank.
the Quest has a data field that shows altitude, not totally accurate, but gives you a good idea of your location.
Both the Quest and 276C have the ability to customize all of the data fields, including showing the time of day, overall average speed, moving average speed. The 550 can only show average speed. Both the Quest and 276C indicate your location on the map with a small triangle with a dot in the center. The 550, on the other hand, being designed for a motorcycle, uses a car or four-wheel-drive truck on the screen to indicate your location. Give me a break.
The 550 does come with a nice motorcycle mount, and automobile mount. and it does have all of the US maps preloaded, but Garman certainly could've done a much better job with the display options.
The Thread