James Burleigh
Well-known member
I wanted to pull this out of FJRBluesman's post that addressed the article in general to focus on the lane-sharing graphic in particular. Also, I elected to post this under "California" instead of NEPRTs, since I'd like to hear what fellow California commuters think about the graphic.
Anyway, here's the graphic. Reminds me of a comics page "What's wrong with this picture?" The answer IMHO--a lot!
Here are my comments. I welcome others--particularly you SoCal folks who are familiar with the type of HOV lane they describe, which we don't have up here (is that really the "safest" place to be?).
JB comments:
But maybe I got it all wrong :rofl: . What do other commuters think?
Jb
Anyway, here's the graphic. Reminds me of a comics page "What's wrong with this picture?" The answer IMHO--a lot!
Here are my comments. I welcome others--particularly you SoCal folks who are familiar with the type of HOV lane they describe, which we don't have up here (is that really the "safest" place to be?).
JB comments:
- Obviously the choice of the phrase "lane splitting."
- The example on the right isn't lane sharing; it's excessive lane changing. Lane sharing is typically (for me anyway, and I think many others) up between the nos. 1 and 2 lanes. Sure we occasionally go wide to get past a tight situation, but it ain't the norm, and it sure ain't as safe. Trouble with the graphic is, I'm guessing, cagers will look at this and think, "bullsh*t that it's reasonable to ride that way!" and the graphic will lose credibility.
- Lane sharing isn't riding "on the line between two lanes." It's sharing a lane.
But maybe I got it all wrong :rofl: . What do other commuters think?
Jb
Last edited by a moderator: