Wheel differences - early and late Gen IIs

Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum

Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

mcatrophy

Privileged to ride a 2018 FJR1300AS
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
4,365
Reaction score
1,872
Location
Derby, UK
In preparing for a European tour next week, I got new tyres fitted. I've known that the latest years of the Gen II FJR have different wheels from earlier, but never knew what the difference was. Now I know one difference.

The ABS wheel speed sensors are different, and I thought I'd just show them in case anyone's interested.

The earlier uses a toothed disc on the wheel (picture of my '06)

(Click on image for larger view)



and presumably a coil with a magnet in the pick-up (a "variable reluctance" transducer).

The later uses a ring of what look like alternating magnets (picture of my '10):



and presumably just a coil (with a ferrous but non-magnetised core) as a pick-up.

These pictures are of the rear wheels, the fronts are similar.

No idea why Yamaha chose to change; I've not heard of any underlying problems with the older, so I can only assume it's a cost issue.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The ABS system changed in 2008. According to Wikipedia, Yamaha just changed suppliers, so it's possibly just different, but not necessarily "better". The switch could have been simply motivated by cost or manufacturer/supplier politics.

 
Somewhere around here someone did an excellent job documenting the changes to the 2008 FJR. They did 'improve' the abs in 08 supposedly. I think, maybe, it was like going from two channel to three channel or some such kind of techno talk.

Thanks for posting the photos. I have always wondered what the difference was physically.

Edit: Found the '08 info provided by Constant Mesh way back when: Clicky HERE.

All new ABS system for 2008. The ABS system now features a linear controlled 3 position system (was previously a 2 position system), an ECU integrated compact hydraulic unit, and a new active type wheel sensor with a new magnetic rotor. The benefit is a reduced weight and better lever feedback feeling when the system is operating.
The front and rear wheel rims have been revised to accommodate the new ABS wheel sensors.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Have you tried counting the 'segments' on each wheel? It would be interesting from from a cruise control/VSS point of view. If you know the wheel circumference and the number of segments then you know the Pulses Per Mile (PPM). :rolleyes:

Don

 
Have you tried counting the 'segments' on each wheel?
On 2008+, there's 42 pulses per revolution. The service manual says so (I didn't actually count). This was actually important information for getting my Motty AFR tuner to properly convert the signal to speed for data logging and for determining what gear the bike is in (it calculates it based on the ratio between engine RPM and wheel speed) for per-gear settings.

I think this is the first time that the answer of "42" is not a smart-ass reference to the hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy :)

 
It also looks like the sensor ring bolts on and is replaceable now? I know the old one is pressed on, and it's "buy a new wheel" time if it gets damaged.

Edit: Nope, not according to the Yamaha-motor.com microfiche

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I confirm 42 pulses per wheel revolution (I counted 84 magnet sections in my piccy), presumably alternating N-S-N-S... The older unit also had 42 teeth, so same pulses per rev for both.

To get pulses per mile:

Rear wheel diameter 17 inches,

Rear tyre width: 180mm, aspect ratio 55%, so tyre adds 180 x 0.55 / 25.4 x 2 or 7.8 (near enough) inches to the diameter, so total diameter = 24.8 inches.

Circumference = PI x diameter = 77.9 inches

There are 63360 inches to a mile, so 63360 / 77.9 = 813 revolutions per mile, 813 x 42 = 34156 pulses per mile (OK, some rounding errors in there, but I'm sure that's good enough).

 
Have you tried counting the 'segments' on each wheel?
On 2008+, there's 42 pulses per revolution. The service manual says so (I didn't actually count). This was actually important information for getting my Motty AFR tuner to properly convert the signal to speed for data logging and for determining what gear the bike is in (it calculates it based on the ratio between engine RPM and wheel speed) for per-gear settings.

I think this is the first time that the answer of "42" is not a smart-ass reference to the hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy :)

I confirm 42 pulses per wheel revolution (I counted 84 magnet sections in my piccy), presumably alternating N-S-N-S... The older unit also had 42 teeth, so same pulses per rev for both.

To get pulses per mile:

Rear wheel diameter 17 inches,

Rear tyre width: 180mm, aspect ratio 55%, so tyre adds 180 x 0.55 / 25.4 x 2 or 7.8 (near enough) inches to the diameter, so total diameter = 24.8 inches.

Circumference = PI x diameter = 77.9 inches

There are 63360 inches to a mile, so 63360 / 77.9 = 813 revolutions per mile, 813 x 42 = 34156 pulses per mile (OK, some rounding errors in there, but I'm sure that's good enough).
Thank you both for the info :clapping: that fits in nicely with the upper limit for the Rostra (all electronic) CC of 38,600 PPM :rolleyes:

Don

 
I think this is the first time that the answer of "42" is not a smart-ass reference to the hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy
smile.gif
Great book, good movie.
And here's what made it a "good" movie.....

tumblr_lq05gpBHC21qi6tieo1_500.jpg


 
Top