Malve
Well-known member
Many of us probably remember that in the early 80's Pepsi introduced the "Pepsi Challenge" where they set up blind sip tests around the country challenging Coke by allowing consumers to choose their favorite. Pepsi claimed that more people chose Pepsi over Coke. The truth was, that they were right and the top brass at Coke were worried. So worried in fact that they even eventually came up with New Coke wich ultimately was a flop. Why didn't Coke's worst fears come to fruition?
It turns out that when consumers were sent home for an extended blind comparison test, an overwhelming majority of people did in fact prefer Coke. So what may be better for a try or taste isn't necessarrily what's preferential longer term.
Where are we going with this?
I postulate that the AE is Coke. You will notice that many people (or MC reviewers) that "try" the AE are critical yet most owners have a very high level of satisfaction. I think that, among other things, the re-learning curve associated with the technology lends itself to short term criticism yet long term satisfaction.
It turns out that when consumers were sent home for an extended blind comparison test, an overwhelming majority of people did in fact prefer Coke. So what may be better for a try or taste isn't necessarrily what's preferential longer term.
Where are we going with this?
I postulate that the AE is Coke. You will notice that many people (or MC reviewers) that "try" the AE are critical yet most owners have a very high level of satisfaction. I think that, among other things, the re-learning curve associated with the technology lends itself to short term criticism yet long term satisfaction.
Last edited by a moderator: