tempest766
Well-known member
I've got enough miles on enough tires on enough different bikes now to notice a disturbing trend about tire wear. That is, for the first half of the tread depth the tire wear is extremely slow, but wear accelerates nearer the end of the tread depth, consistently. I'm a very suspicious chap to begin with, understanding that money always trumps quality in the business world...so I'm wondering if when the tire manufacturers claim "hard center rubber" they are only doing that to a minimal depth so that tires do wear out more quickly and need to be replaced more often.
I did a 250 mile overniter on the FJR last weekend. the front BT (stock tire) wasn't quite down to the tread wear indicators yet and I had just checked the pressure at 36-37 PSI. Anyways, when I got home the tire was FREAKIN BALD. Considering how many miles it took to get to the wear indicators (6600) that last bit of tread being eaten up over 250 miles seems way excessive. So, unless that are thermal dynamics or physics issues I'm not up on, I'm left suspecting that the manufacturers are not running the hard center rubber completely to the maximum tread depth on tires that they make.
Thoughts?
I did a 250 mile overniter on the FJR last weekend. the front BT (stock tire) wasn't quite down to the tread wear indicators yet and I had just checked the pressure at 36-37 PSI. Anyways, when I got home the tire was FREAKIN BALD. Considering how many miles it took to get to the wear indicators (6600) that last bit of tread being eaten up over 250 miles seems way excessive. So, unless that are thermal dynamics or physics issues I'm not up on, I'm left suspecting that the manufacturers are not running the hard center rubber completely to the maximum tread depth on tires that they make.
Thoughts?