Eric L
Not that kind of a doctor
Bike:
2009, 8000 miles
stock and v stream windshield
occasional topbox use
PCV with custom dyno map came on used bike, O2 sensor is disconnected, air filter does not have mice living in it.
noticed right away that the computer on bike and the actual mileage had nothing to do with each other. This is because of the PCV. Previous owner said he got 40mpg... uh no. He's wrong. Bike with all stock and a sedate back road commute was getting 30-32 mpg. Screen, top box influenced it only a little. I guess I wasn't going that fast . Even babying it got me no more than 32mpg. Some trips on the highway, down to skyline, and I managed to eek out about 34mpg.
Traded the custom map for the smoothness map translated over from the PCIII. This helped. Mileage with highway 50%/backroads 50% moved up to 36mpg-38mpg. The map that was on the bike was slightly leaner on the left side of the map but very rich on the right side (the highway cruising side). The smoothness map felt a little lean actually at highway speeds to my uneducated ***. But the low end felt essentially the same. After a few tanks of 35-37mpg, I loaded the map from the power commander guys. Its leaner than the smoothness map on the left but a little richer on the highway side. I ran 500 miles through that. I feel no difference in the low end, but to my (again uneducated) ***, the highway feels a little better. On the 350 mile Sunday ride I got 38mpg on twisty hilly route 50 west with a 25mph headwind and 46mpg doing 75mph all the way home on rt 68/rt 70 eastbound. OK, fine I had a tailwind on the way home. But I have NEVER even gotten 38mpg before, let alone 46mpg.
So things are better. 25% better mileage is a great thing with $4 a gallon gasoline prices. I still have the dreaded vibration between 4000-5000 rpm, but haven't done the TBS yet. Hopefully that will help.
2009, 8000 miles
stock and v stream windshield
occasional topbox use
PCV with custom dyno map came on used bike, O2 sensor is disconnected, air filter does not have mice living in it.
noticed right away that the computer on bike and the actual mileage had nothing to do with each other. This is because of the PCV. Previous owner said he got 40mpg... uh no. He's wrong. Bike with all stock and a sedate back road commute was getting 30-32 mpg. Screen, top box influenced it only a little. I guess I wasn't going that fast . Even babying it got me no more than 32mpg. Some trips on the highway, down to skyline, and I managed to eek out about 34mpg.
Traded the custom map for the smoothness map translated over from the PCIII. This helped. Mileage with highway 50%/backroads 50% moved up to 36mpg-38mpg. The map that was on the bike was slightly leaner on the left side of the map but very rich on the right side (the highway cruising side). The smoothness map felt a little lean actually at highway speeds to my uneducated ***. But the low end felt essentially the same. After a few tanks of 35-37mpg, I loaded the map from the power commander guys. Its leaner than the smoothness map on the left but a little richer on the highway side. I ran 500 miles through that. I feel no difference in the low end, but to my (again uneducated) ***, the highway feels a little better. On the 350 mile Sunday ride I got 38mpg on twisty hilly route 50 west with a 25mph headwind and 46mpg doing 75mph all the way home on rt 68/rt 70 eastbound. OK, fine I had a tailwind on the way home. But I have NEVER even gotten 38mpg before, let alone 46mpg.
So things are better. 25% better mileage is a great thing with $4 a gallon gasoline prices. I still have the dreaded vibration between 4000-5000 rpm, but haven't done the TBS yet. Hopefully that will help.