James Burleigh
Well-known member
I just read in the July issue of San Francisco's CityBike magazine ("Ride Fast, Take Chances") the preliminary results of a new motorcycle accident study. One result is that:
"2.5% of crashes in full-face helmets result in a fatality, but that rate more than doubles if you're wearing a novelty helmet, to 5.8%. Similarly, 28.6% of crashes where the rider was wearing a novelty helmet resulted in a head injury, compared to just 1% for full-face helmet wearers. We may need to modify the Official CityBike Position Statement on Helmet Use from 'wear a f**king helmet' to 'wear an actual f**king helmet.'"
Later in the same issue, columnist Maynard Hershon struggles with how to advise a girl rider who is wearing a tank top and shorts about risk and proper gear, concluding,
"If you know a way to explain to a young rider that things do indeed happen, that they happen suddenly and often in ways we cannot prevent, and that those things can have life-changing results, write me and tell me how."
I find that my attitude about this has changed. I think riders, from Mr. Harley Stereotype to Miss Scooter-Riding College Student all know that if they hit a stationary object or slide along the ground, they're gonna be f**ked. So I find that I not only don't suggest to people what they ought to be wearing, but also don't give a damn what they're wearing.
The only material difference for me "as a rider" regarding what you wear is that I won't ride with you if you dress like you're going out to play croquette, because in my mind you are obviously less interested in motorcycle safety than I am, so how do I know you won't f**k me over.
My position I think is summed up in this conclusion to the article I published last year in Friction Zone magazine:
"...riders make their choices [about how to gear up] based on their own unique objectives as to why they ride and on their attitudes toward risk, both which may be very different than another rider's. Their choices are no better or worse--just different. At the same time, we can recognize that some riders' choices may be based on an incomplete understanding of the risks inherent in riding...."
Do some riders have a duty to inform other riders (who are strangers to them) about the "dangers" of motorcycle riding and how to "properly" gear up? When is such advice appropriate? When not? (I'm guessing the societal "economic" argument, regarding what it costs society to fix you up and feed you through a straw the rest of your life, is specious, the speciousness of which could be proven by our lack of interest in that argument for a billion other issues.)
"2.5% of crashes in full-face helmets result in a fatality, but that rate more than doubles if you're wearing a novelty helmet, to 5.8%. Similarly, 28.6% of crashes where the rider was wearing a novelty helmet resulted in a head injury, compared to just 1% for full-face helmet wearers. We may need to modify the Official CityBike Position Statement on Helmet Use from 'wear a f**king helmet' to 'wear an actual f**king helmet.'"
Later in the same issue, columnist Maynard Hershon struggles with how to advise a girl rider who is wearing a tank top and shorts about risk and proper gear, concluding,
"If you know a way to explain to a young rider that things do indeed happen, that they happen suddenly and often in ways we cannot prevent, and that those things can have life-changing results, write me and tell me how."
I find that my attitude about this has changed. I think riders, from Mr. Harley Stereotype to Miss Scooter-Riding College Student all know that if they hit a stationary object or slide along the ground, they're gonna be f**ked. So I find that I not only don't suggest to people what they ought to be wearing, but also don't give a damn what they're wearing.
The only material difference for me "as a rider" regarding what you wear is that I won't ride with you if you dress like you're going out to play croquette, because in my mind you are obviously less interested in motorcycle safety than I am, so how do I know you won't f**k me over.
My position I think is summed up in this conclusion to the article I published last year in Friction Zone magazine:
"...riders make their choices [about how to gear up] based on their own unique objectives as to why they ride and on their attitudes toward risk, both which may be very different than another rider's. Their choices are no better or worse--just different. At the same time, we can recognize that some riders' choices may be based on an incomplete understanding of the risks inherent in riding...."
Do some riders have a duty to inform other riders (who are strangers to them) about the "dangers" of motorcycle riding and how to "properly" gear up? When is such advice appropriate? When not? (I'm guessing the societal "economic" argument, regarding what it costs society to fix you up and feed you through a straw the rest of your life, is specious, the speciousness of which could be proven by our lack of interest in that argument for a billion other issues.)
Last edited by a moderator: