I've done deep gravel for about 50 miles. It was on regular tires and it's wasn't done quickly.
I agree with you when it comes to somewhat ideal unpaved roads close to civilization. In retrospect I described the intended or expected roads in terms that were likely too "civilized". What I was trying to say is that I wasn't planning to use the FJR for rough trail riding or completely off-road. You can plan on the unpaved roads being in great condition but that is not always the case. Not an issue for a day trip but your choices are fewer when on a multi-day excursion; especially when alternate roads are not available. While the Trans Labrador Highway has more paved sections now, there are significant unpaved sections and LOTS of construction. Fresh deep (loose) gravel or newly graded dirt are hard to manage on street tires. Throw in a bunch of rain and I am not at all comfortable. Slick deep mud is bad stuff. While I might like to make a rainy day a "hotel day", there are not exactly a bunch of amenities along the way!From what I've found the FJR does extremely well with its regular street tires on hard packed and lightly graveled dirt roads. I've ridden thousands of miles of the dirt roads in western North Carolina state and national parks without changing anything. Now that you've specified what kind of riding you're looking at I won't change anything to ride more.
Don't overthink it without first trying it.
I have encountered the same (unexpectedly) on the FJR. A couple of years ago, I hit a construction section in a national park. Signage wasn't very specific so I figured it was only a couple of kilometers at most. Expected it to end so I just kept on going (slowly) through loose, deep very coarse gravel for what turned out to be 30 km or so. A white knuckle experience. Other than puncture resistance, I don't know if dual sport tires would have helped a lot - this was bad stuff. Four to six inch depth of unpacked gravel in sizes ranging from golf balls to tennis balls and lots of pointy bits. Needed a bike 200 lb lighter that would have been less damaged in the event of a tip over. An extreme example and if I expected to encounter this again, I would postpone the trip no matter what tires I was using.I've done deep gravel for about 50 miles. It was on regular tires and it's wasn't done quickly.
Sounds similar, The stuff I was on was smaller sized (more like the typical stuff used for chip-and-seal but without the seal and deeper than the height of the rims. Loosy-goosy, stand-on-pegs, keep arms loose (but do-able).I have encountered the same (unexpectedly) on the FJR. A couple of years ago, I hit a construction section in a national park. Signage wasn't very specific so I figured it was only a couple of kilometers at most. Expected it to end so I just kept on going (slowly) through loose, deep very coarse gravel for what turned out to be 30 km or so. A white knuckle experience. Other than puncture resistance, I don't know if dual sport tires would have helped a lot - this was bad stuff. Four to six inch depth of unpacked gravel in sizes ranging from golf balls to tennis balls and lots of pointy bits. Needed a bike 200 lb lighter that would have been less damaged in the event of a tip over. An extreme example and if I expected to encounter this again, I would postpone the trip no matter what tires I was using.
There is always a better tool. I am looking to use a regular hammer when a framing hammer might be more appropriate - not a job that requires a 5 lb sledge.I can't over emphasize picking the right tool for the right job though. If this is something that's "expected", then picking something to overcome it isn't a matter of picking the right tires for the wrong bike.
Enter your email address to join: