E15 is here next year

Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum

Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Apparently this new regulation will be put into effect in 2016, E15 will be the law of the land at least till the current bunch is run out of town.
***,

Please cite your source(s).

Until then its conjecture at best and misinformation at its worst. Meanwhile, the thread is being place in it temporary new home.
NPR last night reported it and it was confirmed on a Fox News report this AM. Apparently the EPA has the controling power in this decision and there will be no put from the Republican congress. This will be an executive fiat. What I heard was that it would be implemented in 2016.
I think what you heard was that EPA was going to allow the (voluntary) sale of E15.....which is quite different than a mandate that E15 completely replace E10.
Yes you are correct, I applogize for stirring things up. I am relieved that I was wrong on this!

 
I don't think that E85 can be dispensed in blender pumps. We don't have it anywhere in the northeast anyway, so it's a non-issue unless we are travelling in the corn belt states.

I would love for them to have all variations of fuel available (in non-blender pumps) and let the market and sales dictate which ones they continue to carry. I'm pretty sure we all know and agree on which blend that will be.

Some enterprising person should start printing and selling bumper stickers:

"Keep the corn for the hogs.

E zero for me!"

 
Fill 'er up!

20130128_mennekes.jpg


Until fuel cells are ready for prime time gas stations need to start installing bays with these. It'll give the fellers up to an hour of wandering around the mini mart buying stuff they didn't know they needed while the car quietly feeds.

 
Some of you probably remember the old Sunoco blender pumps. You could dial it in over a wide range, with several stops (sort of like heated grips
guitar.gif
).

 
We haven't seen them down here in years. Certainly the best deal was at the lower end.

We don't have blender pumps here for ethanol blends either. Most places just sell E10. Several places sell E10 and E0. A few places sell nothing but E0. And then there are the oddballs who sell E85 and BioWillie. BioWillie is actually a blend of regular Diesel with vegetable oil thrown in as filler.

I used to run an IC Engines lab, and I had a 3 cylinder Daihatsu Diesel set up with two tanks ... one with Diesel fuel, and the other with corn oil bought from the grocery store.

You could start and run on either fuel.

Some people like to think that biofuel smells like popcorn or french fries ... but it doesn't. Corn oil and Diesel smell about the same to most noses. If you smell french fries it could be because you got the oil from old frier vats and you're smelling the particulate matter as it combusts.

 
Yeah, I think that what some of the greenies do, is buy the waste oil from the big french fry pushers, run it through a (coffee?) filter and then burn it in their VW Jetta.

Then they wonder why they have all the stoners with the munchies following them around town. ;)

 
Ten years ago I had a student who converted his VW to run waste vegetable oil from local restaurants, and from the university cafeteria.

It was unreliable in fuel injectors, and it was not unusual for him to call to inform me that he would not be reporting for work because of fuel related engine failure.

Many students were interested in the idea of getting free fuel, but as soon as several people are looking for waste oil, it tends to go up in price from free to something greater than free.

I used to tell the students to think about supply and demand in this way. 1. How much waste vegetable oil is produced in the course of a normal day based on your diet. 2. How much Diesel do you need to meet your transportation needs on a daily basis.

Since the answer to 1 was nearly always "a few ounces" and the answer to 2 was nearly always "at least half a gallon", even the most math challenged students could understand that large scale use of waste cooking oil as fuel for the general population isn't likely to be feasible.

The idea hardly ever comes up anymore.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK. I can't resist.
If I've got 15 liters of E10, about 1.5 liters of this is ethanol.

If the guy in front of me used E85, which I can't imagine anyone doing because it sucks so much as a fuel, then I've got about a liter of E85 to contend with, which would be about .85 liters more of ethanol.

So my original intent would have been to have 1.5 liters of ethanol in my tank, but now I've got 2.3ish.

We're still in the mode here where we have stations that sell real gasoline, and so we buy it.

And I made 169 bushels of corn to the acre this past growing season ... that's how I know how lousy prices are and how overblown supply is worldwide.

From a corn farmer perspective, it would help prices to have an E85 mandate, but it would lead to revolt among fuel consumers, even in the corn states.
Ooh... ooh... I know, I know. Both trains will get to Biloxi at the same time.

 
Anybody who runs E85 because it is cheaper and chooses to fill the tank with it a second time is mathematically and financially challenged.
E85 has a much lower energy content compared to E10 or E0 (real gasoline).

Your mpg will drop quite a bit so that even the least casual observer should be able to notice it. The cost difference doesn't come close to making up the mpg difference, at least not around here.
I explained this to my father in law when he got his current vehicle. He came home proud of how little it cost to fill his tank. When he saw his mileage when he hit empty he did the math, and filled up with regular gas.
biggrin.png


 
Ooh... ooh... I know, I know. Both trains will get to Biloxi at the same time.
Here's another one.

If you've got one bucket that holds 2 gallons and another bucket that holds 5 gallons, how many buckets do you have?

If you get it right, you're the smartest guy in the world (in 2505).

 
No worries. Not Sure is still the smartest (I know some of you have seen Idiocracy). Although you've got the most Chittlin's.
focus.gif


 
I've run the numbers several times in my cages for E-0 gas v/s E-10 gas. At least right now for here, it's a wash.

On the 2003 Silverado, E-0 gets 16-16.5 mpg, verses 14.5-15.0 for the crap-o-Nol. So between 7 and 13%, call it 10% average. E-0 cost $0.20 cheaper currently ($1.99 v/s $1.79), or right at 11%

The numbers for the 2008 CR-v are very similar, about a wash.

For the 2007 Yamaha 90hp 2-stroke outboard, surprisingly, the E-10 gets about the same mileage but admittedly in the case of the boat, there are way too many variables to validate the test.

I haven't tried it on any of my motorcycles yet, including my current 2014 Fjr

If the E-0 was as convenient to purchase as the crap, I'd do it purely on a matter of principle.

 
I've run the numbers several times in my cages for E-0 gas v/s E-10 gas. At least right now for here, it's a wash. On the 2003 Silverado, E-0 gets 16-16.5 mpg, verses 14.5-15.0 for the crap-o-Nol. So between 7 and 13%, call it 10% average. E-0 cost $0.20 cheaper currently ($1.99 v/s $1.79), or right at 11%

The numbers for the 2008 CR-v are very similar, about a wash.
When you say that using E-0 vs E10 is a wash it appears you are talking about cost per mile. However, your assertion that there is a 10 percent difference in the miles traveled per galleon would also suggest that the E10 has zero energy, or contributes zero to the E-0 it s added to. If so, then how does one explain how the E85 works at all?
I don't buy the argument that 9 galleons of E-0 will take you as far as 10 galleons of E10 but I have heard that argument many times.

My understanding is that ethanol has 70 percent the energy of gasoline so one would expect that a 10 percent concentration would result in a 3 percent energy loss per tank, or about 1-1.5 mpg on a FJR.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't understand what you are writing.

My personal comparison test are purely from a cost of fuel per mile on my own engines. In my own test, considering the current cost of fuel in my city, and my own differences in mileage observed under two separate and complete tanks of fuel, driving under similar conditions, there is no appreciable difference in cost of the either fuel.

None of the owners manuals for my engines reccomend anything greater than E-10, so in the absence of any mandate, I won't be running any test comparisons on the E-15

 
Top