hppants
Well-known member
Now that I've got a couple thousand miles under my belt with the Gen III, I have a few things to share and ask:
1. The ABS is wonderful. I will NEVER have a motorcycle without ABS again.
2. The linked brakes are a huge improvement over the Gen I bike. However, I wish the front brake was linked the the rear brake, and not just the other way around. If I could get just a touch of rear brake when I'm hard on the front brake, then with the exception of emergency situations, I'd never have to move my right foot. Lazy I know, but admitting it is the first step. BTW - it is my understanding that the ST1300 ABS is linked both ways.
3. The "AVG FUEL MILEAGE" display thingie is dead nuts correct. I've checked it out on 4 or 5 tanks of gas and it is within 0.1 mpg.
4. Also, the "RANGE" indicator is extremely accurate. When the "LO" display comes on, you are literally down to fumes. Yesterday, I was running the numbers in my head trying to get home without stopping for gas. There was a thunderstorm coming in and I was trying to avoid it. 1 mile from my house, the range went to "LO". Taking the "AVG FUEL MILEAGE" as accurate, I'm running the numbers and thinking I've got at least a quart left (10 miles worth). As I round the last curve before home, it farted once. Didn't do it again, so I packed a small gas can on the rack and rode to the gas station today. Made it the 4 miles with no other problems. Took 6.4 gallons. My Gen I would suck the full 6.6 gallons out of it (I ran out of gas twice in it).
5. The speedo error on the Gen III is identical to the Gen I. 80 mph inicated is 77 mph actual.
6. I didn't realize how much I would enjoy cruise control. I used the throttlemeister a lot on my Gen I, but the cruise is so much more effective - especially when you are in a popo rich environment.
7. The BT023s are better than I expected. At first, they were kind of slick, but now that I've rubbed off the chicken strips, at least in the dry, they are pretty good. I see that they are cheaper than the Michelin PR2 tire - depending on the mileage I get out of them, this may be something to think about.
8. Can anybody tell me if running in "touring mode" saves gas if you are cruising at a steady speed, and if so, how much? I get the saving fuel in the stop/go part.
9. IF there is a better windscreen for this bike than the Cee Bailey Sport, I'd like to see it. Perfect combination for me in all conditions.
10. There is so much less vibration on my pegs and hands on the GEN III. The bike is really much smoother.
11. The fit and finish on this bike is better. The paint is better. And I like the black rims - they don't show the dirt as much.
12. Perhaps the biggest single improvement from the Gen I is the heat management. This time of year, my legs would ROAST. So would the "jewels". Not so with the new bike.
That's all I got for now - what do other Gen III owners (who were formally Gen I owners) think?
1. The ABS is wonderful. I will NEVER have a motorcycle without ABS again.
2. The linked brakes are a huge improvement over the Gen I bike. However, I wish the front brake was linked the the rear brake, and not just the other way around. If I could get just a touch of rear brake when I'm hard on the front brake, then with the exception of emergency situations, I'd never have to move my right foot. Lazy I know, but admitting it is the first step. BTW - it is my understanding that the ST1300 ABS is linked both ways.
3. The "AVG FUEL MILEAGE" display thingie is dead nuts correct. I've checked it out on 4 or 5 tanks of gas and it is within 0.1 mpg.
4. Also, the "RANGE" indicator is extremely accurate. When the "LO" display comes on, you are literally down to fumes. Yesterday, I was running the numbers in my head trying to get home without stopping for gas. There was a thunderstorm coming in and I was trying to avoid it. 1 mile from my house, the range went to "LO". Taking the "AVG FUEL MILEAGE" as accurate, I'm running the numbers and thinking I've got at least a quart left (10 miles worth). As I round the last curve before home, it farted once. Didn't do it again, so I packed a small gas can on the rack and rode to the gas station today. Made it the 4 miles with no other problems. Took 6.4 gallons. My Gen I would suck the full 6.6 gallons out of it (I ran out of gas twice in it).
5. The speedo error on the Gen III is identical to the Gen I. 80 mph inicated is 77 mph actual.
6. I didn't realize how much I would enjoy cruise control. I used the throttlemeister a lot on my Gen I, but the cruise is so much more effective - especially when you are in a popo rich environment.
7. The BT023s are better than I expected. At first, they were kind of slick, but now that I've rubbed off the chicken strips, at least in the dry, they are pretty good. I see that they are cheaper than the Michelin PR2 tire - depending on the mileage I get out of them, this may be something to think about.
8. Can anybody tell me if running in "touring mode" saves gas if you are cruising at a steady speed, and if so, how much? I get the saving fuel in the stop/go part.
9. IF there is a better windscreen for this bike than the Cee Bailey Sport, I'd like to see it. Perfect combination for me in all conditions.
10. There is so much less vibration on my pegs and hands on the GEN III. The bike is really much smoother.
11. The fit and finish on this bike is better. The paint is better. And I like the black rims - they don't show the dirt as much.
12. Perhaps the biggest single improvement from the Gen I is the heat management. This time of year, my legs would ROAST. So would the "jewels". Not so with the new bike.
That's all I got for now - what do other Gen III owners (who were formally Gen I owners) think?