Just went through my log book. I'm really anal retentive about maintance logs from my time as a field engineer in Prudhoe Bay. Discovered lots of turbine and compressor problems there we would have otherwise overlooked had we not had the detailed reports to look back on.
Well, it paid off. I generally write down and reset the MPG every time I fill up. I went back and recalculated all of the MPG's by hand, i.e., miles divided by gallons (duh) as I record all that too. Turns out there is a difference of between 9-12% between the computer calculated MPG and the hand calculated MPG. The hand calculated is always lower and in line with what has been reported here before (about 35-39 MPG-ish) with the addition of a PC-III and the Wally map. So it looks like the computer calculates the MPG based on what it thinks it's sending to the injectors, not what's actually being sent to the injectors. No fuel flow meter on the fuel rail or feed back from the injectors themselves. Sorry if I'm stating something that's been said before, I must have missed it.
So that's why I felt like I had swapped my tank for one from a Sportster this last weekend. The MPG was telling me something different than what was actually happening. I probably only noticed the difference because I was riding with the guy with the 1200RT. So at 25L (6.5 Gal) you should get about 230 miles max out of a tank with a PC-III installed.
Looking back at the dates of the ignition switch swap, there is no apparent difference in MPG and I have many tanks both before and after the switch change to verify any trend.
Also re-confirmed that I get better gas mileage at high altitude. Looks like an almost 10% increase between Houston and Santa Fe NM.