Hello everyone,
I was just wondering if anyone has tried to put a Gen I final drive on a Gen II; from my info the Gen II has a slight longer swing arm and also different final drive ratio (for reducing a little the rpm and consumption). I don't know if the difference between the 2 swingarms involves differences in the final drive assembly or it is a direct swap. Of course, I suppose that only the final sprockets could be changed but this involves dismantling the final drive assembly, adjusting the free play between the sprockets by inserting different shims etc, which is much more complicated and probably involves the same expenses as a used final drive.
So if the final drive assembly is a direct swap I was thinking this could bring a slight performance improvement in upper gears (especially that most of the time I ride 'full' - wife and luggage). I saw some articles from German magazine Motorrad and one of the test they apply on all the bikes is elasticity in top gear (5th for the FJR) for 60-100km/h; 100-140km/h and 140-180km/h. They measured visible improved times for the Gen I over Gen II, so I suppose this is mainly due to the final drive ratio differences (2.773 vs 2.698) since the power/torque figures are the same (from my knowledge).
Any info is welcome
Thanks.
I was just wondering if anyone has tried to put a Gen I final drive on a Gen II; from my info the Gen II has a slight longer swing arm and also different final drive ratio (for reducing a little the rpm and consumption). I don't know if the difference between the 2 swingarms involves differences in the final drive assembly or it is a direct swap. Of course, I suppose that only the final sprockets could be changed but this involves dismantling the final drive assembly, adjusting the free play between the sprockets by inserting different shims etc, which is much more complicated and probably involves the same expenses as a used final drive.
So if the final drive assembly is a direct swap I was thinking this could bring a slight performance improvement in upper gears (especially that most of the time I ride 'full' - wife and luggage). I saw some articles from German magazine Motorrad and one of the test they apply on all the bikes is elasticity in top gear (5th for the FJR) for 60-100km/h; 100-140km/h and 140-180km/h. They measured visible improved times for the Gen I over Gen II, so I suppose this is mainly due to the final drive ratio differences (2.773 vs 2.698) since the power/torque figures are the same (from my knowledge).
Any info is welcome
Thanks.