Hi everyone,
I am writing you with an issue noticed at my '06 Gen II related to rear brake versus trail braking. After previous experience with the CBR1100 Blackbird linked brakes (which I delinked and was satisfied with them - except for increased front dive under heavy front braking plus some increased needed pressure in the lever for activating all front pistons), when I bought the FJR I was determined to delink the brakes but I gave up since the brakes were quite well balanced (trail braking possible until a certain point without activating front) and another reason was that a FJR delink brake kit was not very easy to find (in the absence of a kit I didn't want to start improvising brake lines etc).
Though at the last time technical inspection (the mandatory one necessary for allowing the bike to be used in traffic for another 2 years) the inspector complained about reduced rear brake efficiency. They put each wheel (by turn) in a roller-brake measuring stand and test the brakes using also a pressure sensor either on the pedal or on the lever, depending which brake is tested. He showed me that there is a big gap between pedal force and rear wheel brake effect. This was confirming somehow my suspicions since during trail-braking I had started in the last months to sense some front dive and some 'raising' trend of the bike from leaned position in curves. Another fact was that the last rear pad set is lasting for almost 30.000miles for same riding style and similar roads (compared to max. 20.000 initial 2 sets ) and for same OEM Nissin pads used every time.
I studied more in detail the rear brake system for potential root causes and I concluded that the rear pump is sending pressure splitted to:
- proportioning valve. This one allows pressure to be sent to the rear caliper up to a preset pressure. After that specific pressure some sort of internal valve is blocking/limiting pressure to be further applied to rear piston;
- second split is the metering valve. This one is actually opening at a certain threshold, allowing pressure to be sent also to the front right caliper.
So these 2 valves work in sort of opposite directions: one is blocking pressure to be 'forwarded' further from it and the other one is allowing pressure to pass when a certain pressure is built in the system. Now for my issue I have the following 'suspects':
1) rear master cylinder. It could be that it's not building anymore the needed pressure. Though, taking into account that at higher foot force the front is diving and brake effect is felt (without applying hand lever brake) it's clear that pressure is built in the system by the master cylinder.
2) rear caliper issues. During normal riding (without rear braking) the pads and rotor are not heating at all - so blocked piston issue for lack of rear brake effect is out of question. Also the 2 slider pins of the caliper are fine and lubricated. A relatively inexpensive preventive maintence I could do is to buy the piston and seal rings and test again after that...
3) proportioning valve. A malfunction on this valve could block too early the pressure sent to the caliper. The problem is that it's quite difficult to measure pressures/diagnose and the valve is also sealed (no maintenance possible). Price displayed in US ~100$ (might be 150$ or more with customs tax and transport to Europe - price at local Yamaha is 200Euros plus ).
4) metering valve. A malfunction on this valve could allow too early the pressure to be sent to front, balancing from the beginning rear/front pressures and decreasing the rear brake force. Like 3) above (proportioning valve) it's not easy to diagnose, the price is a little less though. Still I think it's working ok since indeed a higher foot pressure is needed for activating the front (and sense the dive); that higher pressure is needed to reach the metering valve opening threshold I assume.
An option I was evaluating consists in eliminating completely the 'proportioning valve' (remains to be tested if the rear caliper hose can be easily connected directly on the ABS exit where the proportioning valve had the small hose connected from factory). The logical effect would be more rear brake from pedal and less for front; though in this setup the rear ABS could be triggered earlier for what used to be 'medium' brakes (less probable in my case since 99% of the time I ride with wife on bike and luggage and rear is prone to block at light rear weight on bike). Normally the bike should become more friendly while trail--braking (like an un-linked braking system).
Any recommendations would be welcome.
Thanks.
I am writing you with an issue noticed at my '06 Gen II related to rear brake versus trail braking. After previous experience with the CBR1100 Blackbird linked brakes (which I delinked and was satisfied with them - except for increased front dive under heavy front braking plus some increased needed pressure in the lever for activating all front pistons), when I bought the FJR I was determined to delink the brakes but I gave up since the brakes were quite well balanced (trail braking possible until a certain point without activating front) and another reason was that a FJR delink brake kit was not very easy to find (in the absence of a kit I didn't want to start improvising brake lines etc).
Though at the last time technical inspection (the mandatory one necessary for allowing the bike to be used in traffic for another 2 years) the inspector complained about reduced rear brake efficiency. They put each wheel (by turn) in a roller-brake measuring stand and test the brakes using also a pressure sensor either on the pedal or on the lever, depending which brake is tested. He showed me that there is a big gap between pedal force and rear wheel brake effect. This was confirming somehow my suspicions since during trail-braking I had started in the last months to sense some front dive and some 'raising' trend of the bike from leaned position in curves. Another fact was that the last rear pad set is lasting for almost 30.000miles for same riding style and similar roads (compared to max. 20.000 initial 2 sets ) and for same OEM Nissin pads used every time.
I studied more in detail the rear brake system for potential root causes and I concluded that the rear pump is sending pressure splitted to:
- proportioning valve. This one allows pressure to be sent to the rear caliper up to a preset pressure. After that specific pressure some sort of internal valve is blocking/limiting pressure to be further applied to rear piston;
- second split is the metering valve. This one is actually opening at a certain threshold, allowing pressure to be sent also to the front right caliper.
So these 2 valves work in sort of opposite directions: one is blocking pressure to be 'forwarded' further from it and the other one is allowing pressure to pass when a certain pressure is built in the system. Now for my issue I have the following 'suspects':
1) rear master cylinder. It could be that it's not building anymore the needed pressure. Though, taking into account that at higher foot force the front is diving and brake effect is felt (without applying hand lever brake) it's clear that pressure is built in the system by the master cylinder.
2) rear caliper issues. During normal riding (without rear braking) the pads and rotor are not heating at all - so blocked piston issue for lack of rear brake effect is out of question. Also the 2 slider pins of the caliper are fine and lubricated. A relatively inexpensive preventive maintence I could do is to buy the piston and seal rings and test again after that...
3) proportioning valve. A malfunction on this valve could block too early the pressure sent to the caliper. The problem is that it's quite difficult to measure pressures/diagnose and the valve is also sealed (no maintenance possible). Price displayed in US ~100$ (might be 150$ or more with customs tax and transport to Europe - price at local Yamaha is 200Euros plus ).
4) metering valve. A malfunction on this valve could allow too early the pressure to be sent to front, balancing from the beginning rear/front pressures and decreasing the rear brake force. Like 3) above (proportioning valve) it's not easy to diagnose, the price is a little less though. Still I think it's working ok since indeed a higher foot pressure is needed for activating the front (and sense the dive); that higher pressure is needed to reach the metering valve opening threshold I assume.
An option I was evaluating consists in eliminating completely the 'proportioning valve' (remains to be tested if the rear caliper hose can be easily connected directly on the ABS exit where the proportioning valve had the small hose connected from factory). The logical effect would be more rear brake from pedal and less for front; though in this setup the rear ABS could be triggered earlier for what used to be 'medium' brakes (less probable in my case since 99% of the time I ride with wife on bike and luggage and rear is prone to block at light rear weight on bike). Normally the bike should become more friendly while trail--braking (like an un-linked braking system).
Any recommendations would be welcome.
Thanks.