MCRIDER007
Well-known member
I had the opportunity to get up close and personal with JohnnyB's Hyperpro springs at the last tech day and the springs are much thicker than what shows in the picture and the transition from the two spring rates is even more pronounced. I don't see how they can be called "progressive" since there is nothing progressive about the way they are going to perform, the tightly bound springs are going to bind just from the weight of the bike (I could bind the tightly wound springs with just the weight of my upper body) and the rider will be using the "stiff" end of the springs 100 percent of the time.....just like a GL1800 with OEM fork springs. I thought it strange that Hyperpro doesn't give any data about the actual spring rates.Edit - The plot thickens... I just went to the Hyperpro web site and can see that their springs are not fixed rate springs. They are progressively wound springs. This explains why they want to get rid of the air spring effect. They have built in a proigressive rate into the coil spring and do not want the air springs contribution messing up their pre-defined rates.
They are big and bulky and are going to displace a lot of air but I doubt it is an additional 210 cc.