I test so you don't have to. Consider me the Consumer Reports dude
:
I just put one in my '13. No particular need yet, of course, since the OEM battery is plenty new. I'm trying it out: $219, free shipping. As stated above, the first one was defective and was replaced at no charge (including shipping both ways). The main difference between this and the Shorai is that EarthX batteries have internal circuitry to balance the charge among the cells, while the Shorai (and others) do not.
Replacement went in OK. BUT pay attention. Unlike the OEM, it would be easy to install this battery with polarity reversed. That would be bad
As with the Shorai, the thing is silly light - more than 7 pounds lighter than the OEM. So I've cut the bike's overall weight by 1%
(But it is almost all front-wheel weight and somewhat high in the chassis.)
It's also considerably smaller in two of the 3 dimensions. But without significant mods to the cables and battery box, there isn't much space savings, as it basically needs to be installed such that the top of the EarthX is on the same level as the OEM. So any extra room would be underneath the battery.
SIDE NOTE: Even with the modified panel over the battery, in the '13 removal/reinstall of the OEM battery requires popping off that front panel. Not so with the EarthX, FWIW.
Cold-weather performance looks great so far, with the bike cranking fine on cold mornings. Subjectively, it seems to crank a bit better than the OEM. BUT it hasn't been that cold, merely high 30's. Nevertheless that would have been cold enough for my original Shorai (2-year old vintage) to have exhibited some weakness.