Polaroid shuts factories...

Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum

Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Groo

The Endless Font of Useless Knowledge...
Joined
Jun 24, 2005
Messages
2,734
Reaction score
0
Location
Friendswood, TX
https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080208/ap_on_...R8y_GnRDzgE1vAI

BOSTON - Polaroid Corp. is dropping the technology it pioneered long before digital photography rendered instant film obsolete to all but a few nostalgia buffs.

Polaroid is closing factories in Massachusetts, Mexico and the Netherlands and cutting 450 jobs as the brand synonymous with instant images focuses on ventures such as a portable printer for images from cell phones and Polaroid-branded digital cameras, televisions and DVD players.

This year's closures will leave Polaroid with 150 employees at its Concord headquarters and a site in the nearby Boston suburb of Waltham, down from peak global employment of nearly 21,000 in 1978.

The company stopped making instant cameras over the past two years.

"We're trying to reinvent Polaroid so it lives on for the next 30 to 40 years," Tom Beaudoin, Polaroid's president, chief operating officer and chief financial officer, said in a phone interview Friday, after the company's plans were reported in The Boston Globe.

Polaroid failed to embrace the digital technology that has transformed photography, instead sticking to its belief that many photographers who didn't want to wait to get pictures developed would hold onto their old Polaroid cameras.

Global sales of traditional camera film have been dropping about 25 percent to 30 percent per year, "and I've got to believe instant film has been falling as fast if not faster," said Ed Lee, a digital photography analyst at the research firm InfoTrends Inc.

"At some point in time, it had to reach the point where it was going to be uneconomical to keep producing instant film," Lee said.

Privately held Polaroid doesn't disclose financial details about its instant film business.

Polaroid instant film will be available in stores through next year, the company said — after which, Lee said, Japan's Fujifilm will be the only major maker of instant film.

Polaroid got its start making polarized sunglasses in the 1930s, and introduced its first instant camera in 1948. Film packs contained the chemicals for developing images inside the camera, and photos emerged from the camera in less than a minute.

Polaroid's overall revenue from instant cameras, film and other products peaked in 1991 at nearly $3 billion. The company went into bankruptcy in 2001 and was bought four years later for $426 million by Minnetonka, Minn.-based consumer products company Petters Group Worldwide.

Polaroid's newly announced job cuts include 150 positions to be eliminated over the next couple months at Massachusetts operations in Norwood and Waltham, which make large-format films for technical and industrial photography. Later this year, Polaroid will close plants employing 300 workers in the Mexican state of Queretaro and in Enschede, Netherlands.

Meanwhile, Polaroid is seeking a partner to acquire licensing rights for its instant film, in hopes that another firm will continue making the film to supply Polaroid enthusiasts.

As it seeks to gain a foothold in digital photography this year, Polaroid plans to sell an 8-ounce photo printer slightly bigger than a deck of cards that requires no ink and prints business card-sized pictures. It uses thermal printing technology from Zink Imaging Inc., founded by private investors who bought technologies from Polaroid as it was coming out of bankruptcy.

Polaroid also has its brand name on foreign-made TVs, DVD players, digital photo frames, cameras and MP3 music players. Those products generated nearly $1 billion in revenue last year for Polaroid's parent firm, Beaudoin said.

 
The demise of instant film is no surprise. You can have instant pictures with a digital camera and printer for a lot less money per print than polariod instant film.

Regarding IBA rallies, the only one I ever participated in was the 2007 Rhode Island Rally, and they accepted digital pictures.

 
"Trying to build a company so that it lives for 30 or 40 years" Can you be a little more specific? :)

Wow, I grew up getting beat for playing with the instant polaroid camra we had....8 yr olds find that kinda gadgetry cool in 1976! Heck, even in my retail days, we always had two polaroids and lotsa film to document any accidents in the stores, and that wasnt too long ago.

 
Still, I don't think it's the technology that anyone gives a rats patoot about, but the fact that digital images can be "altered". Guess the IBR will just have to come to grips with the digital world before long.

 
Digital pics of the GPS readout, downloaded at the finish line. No time to alter them.
Assuming you have GPS...

And I remember my buddy's brother was working with Land on the technology (he was a new engineer, and had a pre-production model and was developing pictures in toilet water and stuff...kinda fun for us kids to watch).

TODAY:

I went to my local mall and at the Kodak store they sniffed like I had poo on my shoes even asking if they sold a camera like the Polaroid instant.......and told me Polaroid declared bankrupcy and is just barely alive (don't know if that is true).

Anyway, found the Polaroid 600 at Rite Aid Pharmacy for $40 and film at $15 a pack. They are still selling them, but only two on the shelf. I'm going to compare at other vendors, but thought I'd pass it on.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Digital pics of the GPS readout, downloaded at the finish line. No time to alter them.
Assuming you have GPS...
And assuming you don't have an internet connection to download the picture to a remote team member to then spend days altering picutres....and uploading back to you a person just before the finish line.

The fact is that as many ways as there are to prevent a person to cheat....there are probably tens times as many ways around each one.

I'm confident various rallymasters will do just fine adjusting technologically and will do just fine continuing to expect good sportsmanship.

 
For sale:

1 Polaroid camera, used for 1000 miles in Utah.

Make me an offer I can't refuse. I must warn you I'm holding out for the Smithsonian who I expect will give me at least 500K.

:glare:

 
And assuming you don't have an internet connection to download the picture to a remote team member to then spend days altering picutres....and uploading back to you a person just before the finish line.
The fact is that as many ways as there are to prevent a person to cheat....there are probably tens times as many ways around each one.

I'm confident various rallymasters will do just fine adjusting technologically and will do just fine continuing to expect good sportsmanship.
I'm sure there are those who try to cheat in these types of events, though why they would is somewhat beyond me. As far as I'm concerned, the real point of competing in these events, and others like 10ks, marathons, triatholons, etc., is the self-satisfaction gained from competing and completing, win or lose (yes, it's better to win). That said, I know there is a minority who take on these challenges strictly for bragging rights and the sportsmanship aspect of the particular event, or any event, is lost on them.

Whatever, I agree the various rallymasters will adapt and most participants will play by the new rules, whatever they are. As to the others, their supposed victories are shallow and meaningless, which they know deep down to be true.

 
It's kind of funny that the digital pictures I take of crime scenes are admissible in capital murder trials, but when the same technology is used to verify mileage in Iron Butt rallies it's considered questionable.

 
It's kind of funny that the digital pictures I take of crime scenes are admissible in capital murder trials, but when the same technology is used to verify mileage in Iron Butt rallies it's considered questionable.
I remember reading about a way to verify that a digital photo had not been modified. Probably requires some pricey software.

 
It's kind of funny that the digital pictures I take of crime scenes are admissible in capital murder trials, but when the same technology is used to verify mileage in Iron Butt rallies it's considered questionable.

Well, clearly it's just a matter of how important the evidence is... :unsure:

 
I noticed while watching American Idol last night that they were using polaroid pictures of the contestants. I found that to be a little stange and old fashion.

ARGH.....I just admitted that I watch American Idol. :blink:

 
Top