Rondo777
Well-known member
Im runnng my Power Commander with K&N filter, all else stock and O2 disconnected. I loaded a profile into the PCIII that fits that description and the bike runs great. I did lose about 10mpg but its worth it for the performance. I live in AZ at an altitiude of right around 1000ft. I also own a home in Show Low AZ, at around 7000ft. I rode the bike up there for the first time ever so I cant compare pre PCIII performance at altitude but heres what I found.
At 1000 ft 100 degrees the bike is getting around 40 mpg mixed slab and local, performance is off the chart fun
At 7000 ft 80 degrees the mph have climed back up to 48 mpg mixed riding but the performance is noticably sluggish in comparison.
Thats not what I had expected to happen and I think I need some clarification. I was under the impression that with the O2 sensor disconnected I would be running rich at altitude. I expected the performance to suffer but I didnt expect to see MPG get so much better.
Is the O2 sensors job what I assume it is, to control air fuel mixture?
I know Temp effects density altitiude, is it possible the whole difference is not altitude related at all and when the temp drops to 80 in the valley I'll see similar. Although, It has been in the 70s and 80s for my ride to work and perfomance is really awsome.
Is this the norm when using a PCIII?
Should I be running a leaner PCIII profile when I get to elevation if I plan on staying for a few days?
If I should run a leaner profile, is there a table or has anyone figured out how to edit a profile that you like to work at altitude? Like a formula that you plug in to edit a profile per 1000 feet for instance.?
I know that I'm tossing alot out there but I thought this would be intresting for all the new PCIII owners especially right after the group buy. I'll be heading up next weekend again and would love to be able to test any suggestions that you guys can come up with.
By the way all MPG are calculated and actual, I know not to trust the bike display since installing the PCIII especially!
At 1000 ft 100 degrees the bike is getting around 40 mpg mixed slab and local, performance is off the chart fun
At 7000 ft 80 degrees the mph have climed back up to 48 mpg mixed riding but the performance is noticably sluggish in comparison.
Thats not what I had expected to happen and I think I need some clarification. I was under the impression that with the O2 sensor disconnected I would be running rich at altitude. I expected the performance to suffer but I didnt expect to see MPG get so much better.
Is the O2 sensors job what I assume it is, to control air fuel mixture?
I know Temp effects density altitiude, is it possible the whole difference is not altitude related at all and when the temp drops to 80 in the valley I'll see similar. Although, It has been in the 70s and 80s for my ride to work and perfomance is really awsome.
Is this the norm when using a PCIII?
Should I be running a leaner PCIII profile when I get to elevation if I plan on staying for a few days?
If I should run a leaner profile, is there a table or has anyone figured out how to edit a profile that you like to work at altitude? Like a formula that you plug in to edit a profile per 1000 feet for instance.?
I know that I'm tossing alot out there but I thought this would be intresting for all the new PCIII owners especially right after the group buy. I'll be heading up next weekend again and would love to be able to test any suggestions that you guys can come up with.
By the way all MPG are calculated and actual, I know not to trust the bike display since installing the PCIII especially!
Last edited by a moderator: