On the first 605 occasions something small, usually infuriatingly minute, went just slightly awry and the whole delicate arrangement was wrecked. A drop too much oil there, or here maybe one ball-bearing too many giving a fraction too much impetus to the movement. Whirr, creak, crash, the entire, card-house of consequences was a write-off and they had to start again.
I did a bit of goggling also and there is apparently some controversy about whether there is a splice or not - some sources say it was spliced because the stuido wasn't long enough:A bit of googling found this:
https://www.opinion.telegraph.co.uk/news/ma...3/04/13/ix.html
It's not two takes spliced together - it's all one take - Take _606_ -
from the article:
On the first 605 occasions something small, usually infuriatingly minute, went just slightly awry and the whole delicate arrangement was wrecked. A drop too much oil there, or here maybe one ball-bearing too many giving a fraction too much impetus to the movement. Whirr, creak, crash, the entire, card-house of consequences was a write-off and they had to start again.
might be fun the first two or three hundred takes, but ...
Enter your email address to join: