RossKean
Well-known member
Its all a matter of your personal tolerance (plus your weight, physical condition and whether you suffer from back/hip/circulatory problems etc.). Some people are in real pain after a relatively short period of time on the stock seat. I doubt there is anyone who finds that the stock seat is less painful than the Russell. That said, I don't hate it. Last summer I did a cross-continent trip on a stock seat which included five consecutive 700 mile days. No question that I would have been more comfortable on another seat but as far as I am concerned, the FJR OEM seat isn't as bad as some. It wasn't painless but I was OK within an hour of getting off the bike and was totally ready to go the next day. Shifting around on the seat helps a bit and standing up on the pegs for 10 seconds every now and again is also good. I get off the bike for 5-10 minutes every hour and a half or so; more if I am fatigued or over-heated. I am finding that my tolerance seems to drop in inverse proportion to my age but so far (at 56) I can still stand it.Maybe we could use some form of the above to rate different seats? "Butt miles" is really a kind of joke, but it does seem appropriate
I haven't replaced the original seat yet and I don't know whether I will. Perhaps this winter if I find a bunch of extra cash burning a hole in my pocket. (can't see that happening!)
Ross
Last edited by a moderator: