On many car all-in-one alternators there is a remote voltage sensor input which is used in controlling the alternator's output voltage. This sensor may sample the voltage at the battery, a critical bus location, or some other location.
Looking at the FJR schematics it appears that the R/R has no remote sensing. It attempts to keep the voltage constant at its output terminals. The voltage at a remote location is controlled by voltage drop and the R/R's terminal voltage.
When one attaches accessory loads at the battery terminals the battery charging voltage will be reduced since the voltage drop between the R/R and battery terminals will increase. It's too bad that there aren't accessible terminals near the R/R for accessory connections. Much better to tap into the system there than far away at the battery terminals.
Anyway if the R/R had remote voltage sensing at the battery it would be better for the accessory loads and for battery charging.
It may be likely that the Gen I's see a higher battery charging voltage than the Gen II's.
Looking at the FJR schematics it appears that the R/R has no remote sensing. It attempts to keep the voltage constant at its output terminals. The voltage at a remote location is controlled by voltage drop and the R/R's terminal voltage.
When one attaches accessory loads at the battery terminals the battery charging voltage will be reduced since the voltage drop between the R/R and battery terminals will increase. It's too bad that there aren't accessible terminals near the R/R for accessory connections. Much better to tap into the system there than far away at the battery terminals.
Anyway if the R/R had remote voltage sensing at the battery it would be better for the accessory loads and for battery charging.
It may be likely that the Gen I's see a higher battery charging voltage than the Gen II's.