Joel S.
Well-known member
^^ 190 ?? 50 or 55 ??
Top right corner. Search box. Enter "fatside" without the quotes. Plenty of reading.^^ 190 ?? 50 or 55 ??
Wtf, i know 190, but there is a 50 and 55 option so it would be a 190/50 or a 190/55 that was the questionTop right corner. Search box. Enter "fatside" without the quotes. Plenty of reading.^^ 190 ?? 50 or 55 ??
But yes, a 190 on the rear. I like it when I'm not on the Exalto.
Sigh.... When people mention they mounted a 190, i was asking if it was a 50 or 55First number (180, 190, etc) = Tire width in mm2nd number (50, 55, 60, etc) = Profile, sidewall height % of width.
Since the main objective of going with a larger tire is to get a larger circumference, you would want to go with a 190/55. 55% of 190 = 104.5mm sidewall height A 190/50 (95mm SWH) will also fit, but will have a slightly smaller circumference than a stock 180/55 (99mm SWH).
Since no one else will come out and directly answer your question...yes, many folks are installing a 190/55 for increased rear end height plus the larger diameter for improved speedometer accuracy.Sigh.... When people mention they mounted a 190, i was asking if it was a 50 or 55
I fully understand profiles, but the explanation could be good for people that don't
So 55 seems to be the answer
Correct.. the new tire in my picture is 190/55 x 17. I figure the additional rolling circumference lopped about 75 RPMs off my top gear engine speed.... that's the main reason I went with the bigger size (bonus: easier to get bike on center-stand too....)Sigh.... When people mention they mounted a 190, i was asking if it was a 50 or 55First number (180, 190, etc) = Tire width in mm
2nd number (50, 55, 60, etc) = Profile, sidewall height % of width.
Since the main objective of going with a larger tire is to get a larger circumference, you would want to go with a 190/55. 55% of 190 = 104.5mm sidewall height A 190/50 (95mm SWH) will also fit, but will have a slightly smaller circumference than a stock 180/55 (99mm SWH).
I fully understand profiles, but the explanation could be good for people that don't
So 55 seems to be the answer
Really? I didn't already answer that question?Sigh.... When people mention they mounted a 190, i was asking if it was a 50 or 55First number (180, 190, etc) = Tire width in mm
2nd number (50, 55, 60, etc) = Profile, sidewall height % of width.
Since the main objective of going with a larger tire is to get a larger circumference, you would want to go with a 190/55. 55% of 190 = 104.5mm sidewall height A 190/50 (95mm SWH) will also fit, but will have a slightly smaller circumference than a stock 180/55 (99mm SWH).
I fully understand profiles, but the explanation could be good for people that don't
So 55 seems to be the answer
Spedo is extremely close on a 190/55 like 1mph or so at 70 or 80. Been a few months since i rode it though.how does a 190 55 improve speedo accuracy when the stock tire is a 180 55? They should be the same height but a little wider correct?
............it would appear that none of you guys know about the term "aspect ratio"............
Da Wolf
Enter your email address to join: