SecuLaw
Well-known member
I'm coming across in this thread as a real dick which was never my intention. If I've offended anyone I apologize. I'm a litigation attorney, I breath and live conflict everyday (yes, I'm one of those assholes you all love to hate) but this isn't about conflict. Take it from me the only person, generally, who wins in litigation is the lawyers and we make out whether our client wins or loses. But, as I've attempted to make clear, I have no intention at this moment of going after Yamaha or the dealership. I just want my bike back as fast as is prudent. But I also think that Yamaha should do good by me for making me wait as a result of their corporate parts decision process. Again, what I was requesting is everyone's thoughts on what a reasonable request was or is. I was really hoping someone had a similar experience and what, if anything, Yamaha had offered to them to make it right. That would be a "yardstick" for me to measure what I should request and whether or not Yamaha was blowing me raspberries in a polite corporate manner.Well, I stand corrected Seculaw. :blink: I was speaking in general terms and every state is different. I'm not a lawyer but a Controller and have a some experience with lenders, loans, finance departments, etc. Contracts vary in scope and precision so that's why I spoke in generalities.
Maybe this is a dumb question but what is the possibility the part may be at a dealerships in another state?
One of my questions to them when they were suppose to call me back was whether they had check other dealerships to see if the part was in the dealership inventory. But, they haven't called back so I haven't asked the question yet.