Not if they don't do better in two weeks. Cardiac kids?Trip #2...will it be a re-Pete?!? :unknw:
--G
I believe that term is reserved for my Cleveland Browns...1980 season to be exact.Not if they don't do better in two weeks. Cardiac kids?Trip #2...will it be a re-Pete?!? :unknw:
--G
Yuup, Browns '80 team was the Kardiak Kids, Brian Sipe at them helm if my youthful memory serves correct.I believe that term is reserved for my Cleveland Browns...1980 season to be exact.Not if they don't do better in two weeks. Cardiac kids?Trip #2...will it be a re-Pete?!?
--G
I'm thinking the same thing. Seahawks didn't so much win, the Packers just lost.Not if they don't do better in two weeks. Cardiac kids?Trip #2...will it be a re-Pete?!?
--G
I disagree - the better team did win, the Seahawks made less mistakes at the end of the game then the Packers did. The Packers had many opportunities throughout the game to put it away but failed to do so. Such as, failing to get more than 3 points each time in the first quarter to the red zone. Failing to run back an interception and just taking a knee. Failing to recover the onside kick. Failing to finish the game. Yes the Seahawks played terribly the first 3-1/2 quarters, then they kicked it into gear and took the game back and won it as a team.I'm thinking the same thing. Seahawks didn't so much win, the Packers just lost.Not if they don't do better in two weeks. Cardiac kids?Trip #2...will it be a re-Pete?!?
--G
--G
Enter your email address to join: