I hear it's faster with shorter fingers....19.20
.225
.195
.25 :dntknw: Musta blinked or sumpin'.
I have no idea what the hell you just said... :blink:Seems to me that your time is also going to depend on the speed / latency of the net between your box and https://www.h-e-l.co.uk ...
right now my "ping" return times are:
$ ping www.h-e-l.co.uk
Pinging www.h-e-l.co.uk [82.153.252.57] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 82.153.252.57: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=44
Reply from 82.153.252.57: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=44
Reply from 82.153.252.57: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=44
Reply from 82.153.252.57: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=44
Ping statistics for 82.153.252.57:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 146ms, Maximum = 163ms, Average = 151ms
which explains my .344 sec average ---
that's my story & I'm stickin' to it.
I have no idea what the hell you just said... :blink:Seems to me that your time is also going to depend on the speed / latency of the net between your box and https://www.h-e-l.co.uk ...
right now my "ping" return times are:
$ ping www.h-e-l.co.uk
Pinging www.h-e-l.co.uk [82.153.252.57] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 82.153.252.57: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=44
Reply from 82.153.252.57: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=44
Reply from 82.153.252.57: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=44
Reply from 82.153.252.57: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=44
Ping statistics for 82.153.252.57:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 146ms, Maximum = 163ms, Average = 151ms
which explains my .344 sec average ---
that's my story & I'm stickin' to it.
Geek speaks with forked tongue. Ping irrelevant. Reaction timed using Java script in own computer.sorry - geekspeak. and probably not that important anyway...
Partially?So....isn't it kind of scary that some people have better reaction times when partially loaded :blink: ....
Enter your email address to join: