UselessPickles
Making Grand Canyon replicas from air boxes...
I was about to try a Gen II version of Wally's smoothness map when I decided to do some comparisons to see what's different between Gen I and Gen II fuel maps. Before I get into details, here's some references:
(I don't know who "converted" Wally's map for Gen II)
Wally's map was originally developed for a 2003 FJR with aftermarket exhaust, but he also made a "bone stock" version available that was created by his business partner (Bill; so I'll call it "Bill's smoothness map"). I started my adventure by comparing the Gen II Wally map to the original (using the power commander software's map compare utility). No differences (except for a blip at 0% throttle around 1.5k RPM; that's wierd). I expected there to be some difference between the two maps. Next I downloaded maps from DynoJet's website for both the 2003 FJR (M409-001) and the 2006 FJR (M419-001). A comparison between the two reveals some differences. Since the PCIII fuel maps describe departures from the stock ECU's fuel map, this leads me to believe that there is a difference in stock ECU fuel mapping between the 2003 and 2006 FJR. How much different? Probably the difference between the two PCIII maps from DynoJet.
So to properly convert Wally's smoothness map for use on a Gen II FJR, wouldn't it make sense to adjust the original map by the difference between the 2003 and 2006 stock mappings? I'm no expert in power commanders or performance tuning, but it seems logically sound to me. Are there any tuning experts out there that can verify my thinking?
Being the impatient person I am, I won't wait for a response before trying it myself. Since I have stock exhaust on my bike, I'm starting with the "bone stock" version of Wally's map (now a.k.a. "Bill's smoothness map"). Using some copy&paste skills along with some help from MS Excel, I created my Gen II smoothness map via this mathematical equation:
My bike happens to have a K&N air filter, and the used PCIII that I purchased just happened to come pre-loaded with a custom map for a FJR with a K&N air filter. So I also created a Gen II smoothness map for a K&N air filter as follows:
And to reward those of you that read this far, here's some maps to download:
Again, I am no expert, so use these maps at your own risk. If anyone takes the risk, please report your experience. If anyone is an expert, please let me know if my idea to mathematically adjust Wally's map makes any sense.
(I don't know who "converted" Wally's map for Gen II)
Wally's map was originally developed for a 2003 FJR with aftermarket exhaust, but he also made a "bone stock" version available that was created by his business partner (Bill; so I'll call it "Bill's smoothness map"). I started my adventure by comparing the Gen II Wally map to the original (using the power commander software's map compare utility). No differences (except for a blip at 0% throttle around 1.5k RPM; that's wierd). I expected there to be some difference between the two maps. Next I downloaded maps from DynoJet's website for both the 2003 FJR (M409-001) and the 2006 FJR (M419-001). A comparison between the two reveals some differences. Since the PCIII fuel maps describe departures from the stock ECU's fuel map, this leads me to believe that there is a difference in stock ECU fuel mapping between the 2003 and 2006 FJR. How much different? Probably the difference between the two PCIII maps from DynoJet.
So to properly convert Wally's smoothness map for use on a Gen II FJR, wouldn't it make sense to adjust the original map by the difference between the 2003 and 2006 stock mappings? I'm no expert in power commanders or performance tuning, but it seems logically sound to me. Are there any tuning experts out there that can verify my thinking?
Being the impatient person I am, I won't wait for a response before trying it myself. Since I have stock exhaust on my bike, I'm starting with the "bone stock" version of Wally's map (now a.k.a. "Bill's smoothness map"). Using some copy&paste skills along with some help from MS Excel, I created my Gen II smoothness map via this mathematical equation:
Code:
[Gen II smoothness] = [Bill's smoothness] + ([DynoJet's Stock 2006] - [DynoJet's Stock 2003])
Code:
[Gen II K&N smoothness] = [Bill's smoothness] + ([Custom K&N 2006] - [DynoJet's Stock 2003])
Again, I am no expert, so use these maps at your own risk. If anyone takes the risk, please report your experience. If anyone is an expert, please let me know if my idea to mathematically adjust Wally's map makes any sense.
Last edited by a moderator: