keithaba
Well-known member
You know, I have compared a lot of images between the 70-200mm L (non IS) and the EF 70-300 IS USM. It is damn hard to notice any difference when both lenses at 150mm. Of course, that puts the 70-200 closer to end of it's focal length, but hell, it's an L series lense.A year ago, when I purchased a 70-200mm Canon IS L USM lens, the average street price was way over $2k I won't even mention what the 400mm lens went for.
They are very similar in price tag, aroud 570 each. I opted for the 70-300 because with a telephoto I wanted IS and the extra 100 mm of focal length. All and all, I'm very very very happy with the image quality of the 70-300 IS, farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr superior to the old 75-300.