dcarver
Well-known member
I, as just on voice, would fully support paying more taxes to keep motor officers in functional, tactical, riding gear. Even after having 2 encounters with before mentioned officers who were truly, well, you know. I see kids playing paint ball war games in better gear than our officers; this is not right. The European MX riders ride with 'under' amour. It is flexible, light weight, provides better protection than 'outer' armer, and allows them to display their corporate sponsors on their clothing. This concept could work for motor officers too. The 'appearance' could be Ponch and John while the road rash / tactical protection was covered underneath. IMHO, our motor officers take too many risks with safety for 'appearance'. No way would I ride with their so-called PPE, even as a civilian. IMHO, of course. And, to the forum MO's, I hope to meet you some day; the conversation would be interesting, and I want to know more of what your daily life as an officer is *really* like.OK...I will.
First and foremost it is appearances. Most police administrators are much more concerned with an officers appearance than with the protective side of M/C clothing. I think that most of that is because of ignorance. That's not a shot at my bosses. None of them are motor officers and do not truly understand the considerations that riders must think of.
Clothing (protective) for motor officers is non-existent. It is too small of a nitch for any of the law enforcement clothing manufacturers to dedicate any resources to. Most motor pants are actually mounted officer (i.e. horseback) pants as are the boots. They are purely for looks and offer very minimal protection. One piece of protection that motor officers do have available is their ballistic vest. It offers exceptional abrasion resistance in the event of a get off. They are very hot in the summer and add to the general discomfort of our clothing. Many motor officers elect to not wear their body armor but I always did.
Helmets? Full coverage obviously conceals the face of the officer so most admins won't have it. Tactically, we are trained to remove our helmets whenever we dismount. It presents a larger target and impairs hearing because of the headset. Additionally, the full coverage helmets limit visibility for patrol type operations.
It would be nice if one of the M/C clothing companies would introduce a functional line of clothing that could be used on duty. I really doubt that admins are going to like big "Joe Rocket" logos and the like. Some Aerostich items might be applicable but you start to get into cost considerations. Obviously, the admins are going to want to have the officers look sharp. Continuous riding dirties Aerostich and the like considerably. It would cost a small fortune to equip each officer w/ several sets of high end M/C clothing so that they could stay clean. Add to that the change in seasons and you can see where it would go.
Hope this helps...