Nanahanman
Well-known member
I just completed a real life test of the Cee Bailey +4 and the California Scientific +4 wind screens.
I'm 6' tall with 31 inseem...stock seat at high position... Helli triple tree and 1" riser blocks so fairly high on the bike.
Tested with and without a 20mm spacer mod to the bracket and in both directions on a 4 lane high speed highway to speed of 120 km/h
Cee Bailey
Very nicely made and is completely clear and a tad thicker than the CS
It is slightly wider at the top and slightly narrower at the bottom than the CS
Delivered with new gasket at no extra charge
Good hole alignment for fasteners
Just in my line of sight at the highest setting.
CalSci
Seems a touch cheaper looking and a little milky
Narrower at the top and a bit wider at the bottom than the CB
Good hole alignment for fasteners
Just in line of sight at highest setting
Both screens did about the same job of keeping the air off the helmet but the extra width of the CS at the bottom, kept more air off my hands.
Seemed like dirty air on the CS had less impact on the bike than with the wider CB
HOWEVER...the big difference came with the spacer installation.
The CB was leaning too far back and there was no appreciable change to the air flow or buffeting.
The CS was CONSIDERABLY better with the spacer. The airflow was smother, less buffeting and just below my line of sight at highest setting.
I have never had a bike with such a clean air pocket behind the windscreen as this!
In conclusion, for my application, the CalSci with a spacer works very well and I can't think of how it could be improved.
I'm 6' tall with 31 inseem...stock seat at high position... Helli triple tree and 1" riser blocks so fairly high on the bike.
Tested with and without a 20mm spacer mod to the bracket and in both directions on a 4 lane high speed highway to speed of 120 km/h
Cee Bailey
Very nicely made and is completely clear and a tad thicker than the CS
It is slightly wider at the top and slightly narrower at the bottom than the CS
Delivered with new gasket at no extra charge
Good hole alignment for fasteners
Just in my line of sight at the highest setting.
CalSci
Seems a touch cheaper looking and a little milky
Narrower at the top and a bit wider at the bottom than the CB
Good hole alignment for fasteners
Just in line of sight at highest setting
Both screens did about the same job of keeping the air off the helmet but the extra width of the CS at the bottom, kept more air off my hands.
Seemed like dirty air on the CS had less impact on the bike than with the wider CB
HOWEVER...the big difference came with the spacer installation.
The CB was leaning too far back and there was no appreciable change to the air flow or buffeting.
The CS was CONSIDERABLY better with the spacer. The airflow was smother, less buffeting and just below my line of sight at highest setting.
I have never had a bike with such a clean air pocket behind the windscreen as this!
In conclusion, for my application, the CalSci with a spacer works very well and I can't think of how it could be improved.