This clearly boils down to the value proposition of the insurance, it's cost compared to the potential pay back. On a bike valued at < $2500 would probably be my breaking point since anything above that wouldn't be easy to scrape together.
I can relate this story though...
Two weeks prior to NAFO, 4 of us set out on a two week trip out west. On the 3rd day, a guy wadded up his RT just 12 miles from the hotel in the Custer National Forest. Luckily, he was relatively unscathed. A quick call to his insurance agent that evening, and he was told he'd take care of him in the morning when he got to the office.
We spent the evening at dinner figuring out how to handle the rest of the trip. He figured:
- Insurance would get his bike towed to some repair facility, if fixable, we'd fix it, if not, he'd buy something else. Worse case... He'd rent a car and be our pack mule, meeting us a select locations. (Something he did a couple years ago when he had a problem preventing him from riding more than 100 miles at a time). All was good and well until...
The next morning when the Insurance agent informed him... "Uh, Mr. Hayes, you canceled your collision and comprehensive in April, so you're effectively on your own"
On his own he was... Out a bike, with no chance of payback, 1800 miles from home, with no trip continuation coverage, or help what-so-ever. After burning a day of our trip trying to locate something to get him and his bike back home, he was screwed. $1700 was the cheapest thing we could find one-way to Pensacola Florida, before fuel, food, lodging.
We did luck into a guy with a trailer who brought it *most* of the way for $600, and a $500 flight to get him home but he still has no bike and an wrecked RT to deal with.
All of this makes that $250 he saved look like chicken scratch.