SkooterG
Purveyor of Crooked Facts
Toe, that's a pretty strong accusation to just pull out of your *** IMHO. Especially if you go back and read RenoJohn's accounts of what happens, he already clarified that for the most part:One point I'd like to have clarified: Was the other FJR with the VIN that was pulled out of the cop's *** actually reported stolen by its owner, or did the cop just make that assumption based on the fact that the phantom FJR was registered to somebody other than who was riding it?
I find it hard to believe that the cop accidentally called in a random VIN belonging to a stolen FJR. I've been hanging around this place for over two years and don't remember very many stolen FJR's at all, if any. In fact, a search for the word "stolen" in a topic title turns up nothing on this forum connected to an FJR.
I'm sayin' the cops might have made that stolen **** up to help justify their weak-suck position after Barney Fife totally screwed the pooch.
A cop is not going to do a felony takedown and arrest based on non-matching paperwork. You're right in that if that would ever happen it would be grossly negligent, but the odds of that happening are extremely slim. The cop did a felony takedown/arrest because his dispatch notified him of a "hit" - that the vehicle was a stolen vehicle. You find it hard to beleive? Mistakes happen all the time. Now the coincidence that an FJR with such a close VIN was reported stolen is amazing, but **** happens, right? It was just plain poor policework that the VIN was never verified at any part during this clusterfuck and everything sorted out.Apparently, when he called in the VIN ether he or dispatch transposed the last 2 digits of the VIN from 45 to 54. I can tell you the bike which end in 54 is a stolen FJR1300AE. I guess when dispatch confirmed the make, model, and color they did not feel the need to verify the VIN a second time just to be sure.
Your tone suggest some bias or axe to grind. Waddup?